Is there a universal relationship between momentum and wave vector?

hokhani
Messages
561
Reaction score
18
Is always there the relation p=(h/2π)k between p and k or it is only for the free particle case? What?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's only a free particle case, but since many systems can approximate free particles to some degree, it might retain some more general validity. For something to have a definite momentum, it has to have a wave function in position basis (i.e., a function of position) that is an eigenfunction of the operator -i hbar d/dx. Eigenfunctions like that yield p times the eigenfunction when you plug them through the operator, so the x dependence is ei hbar p x for p in the x direction. Since k is normally defined as ei k x, that will be the same as your expression, but only for states of definite momentum. Those are also called free particle states because they are also energy eigenfunctions when there is no potential energy (the particle is free). I suppose you could prepare a particle in a state of definite momentum even in the presence of a potential energy, but it wouldn't maintain that definite momentum because it would evolve into indeterminate momentum, so the p relation wouldn't mean much if the particle were not acting like a free particle.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top