Momentum - Bumping 2 carts with magnets

AI Thread Summary
In the experiment involving two carts colliding with magnets, the final momentum was found to be slightly less than the initial momentum, raising questions about the discrepancy. The primary hypothesis suggests that friction and rolling resistance are impacting the motion, leading to a lower measured velocity and, consequently, reduced momentum. Additionally, the relationship between kinetic energy and momentum indicates that energy lost as sound or heat during the collision further contributes to this reduction. While momentum is expected to be conserved in an ideal scenario, external forces like friction can hinder this conservation. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of real-world physics versus theoretical expectations.
Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0
Momentum -- Bumping 2 carts with magnets...

Homework Statement


I recently did an experiment in which I had bump a dynamic cart into another one with their magnets facing inwards to emulate a perfectly inelastic collision. Upon examining the initial and the final momentum of the cart, the final momentum was slightly less. Where did that fraction go, other than experimental error?


The Attempt at a Solution



My hypothesis is that there is friction acting upon the motion of the carts, so the velocity measured is less than it it should be, resulting in less momentum. Because momentum = mv. Also, because of the connection between kinetic energy and momentum. We know that kinetic energy is not conserved, so if a lot of the kinetic energy is lost as sound/heat energy, then the carts would have less kinetic energy than it would have in a perfect ideal situation. And less kinetic energy = less velocity = less momentum than it would have. So that's my hypothesis of why the final momentum is less than it's initial in terms of the calculations. But ofc, it's suppose to be conserved.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The loss of energy is not relevant, but certainly friction / rolling resistance could reduce the momentum since this is an external force.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top