Momentum conservation and Newton's 3rd

AI Thread Summary
A soldier holding a machine gun experiences a force from the gun when it fires due to the conservation of momentum, as the bullet's momentum change creates an equal and opposite reaction on the gun. This force is calculated using the formula F = Δmv/Δt, where Δm is the change in momentum of the bullet over time. While Newton's third law states that forces are equal and opposite, the discussion emphasizes the need to articulate the relationship between the forces acting on both the gun and the soldier. The conservation of momentum provides a more straightforward explanation for the force experienced by the soldier. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving related physics problems effectively.
mrcotton
Messages
120
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Explain why a soldier holding the machine gun will experience a force from the gun
whilst it is firing bullets


Homework Equations



Momentum is always conserved in closed systems

F= Δmv/Δt

The Attempt at a Solution



The system has zero momentum then when the bullet is fired we must have an equal but opposite momentum.

The force on the gun is the bullets change in momentum divided by the time that the momentum change occurs in.

So why can't we just say according to Newtons 3rd that there must be an equal and opposite force of the gun on the soldier?

Any help appreciated
D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What makes you think that we can't say that?
 
I think you'd need to be more careful than that - this is an exercize given as part of your education so you have to demonstrate that you understand the physics involved.

So - there is a force of the gun on the soldier - what is it equal and opposite to?
(you have to actually say...)

The conservation of momentum answer is just quicker.
(though you didn't complete that answer either...)

Wite out both complete answers side by side and see which one you prefer.

Anyway - you may happen to know that the question is part of an exam set on "conservation of momentum" - just like you know you are expected to do the problem in Newtonian mechanics without having to be told ;)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top