Momentum Conserved? Physics Q&A on 1 kg Cart

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeffxtreme
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
In the scenario of a 1 kg cart moving at 5 m/s with a 1 kg weight dropped onto it, momentum is conserved during the inelastic collision. The initial momentum of the cart is 5 kg m/s, and after the weight is added, the final velocity of the cart and weight system is calculated to be 2.5 m/s. This deceleration occurs due to the equal and opposite forces acting between the cart and the weight during the collision, which happens over a specific time interval. If the weight were accelerated to match the cart's speed before being placed on it, the final velocity would remain unchanged. Understanding these principles is crucial for applications like safety in car crashes, where impulse and force dynamics play a significant role.
jeffxtreme
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I kind of confused about this physics question.

Assume for example a 1 kg cart is moving at a constant speed of 5 m/s on a frictionless service. Then, a 1 kg weight is dropped onto the cart. Would its initial momentum be conserved? What would be it's final velocity?

At first, the cart has a momentum of 5 kg m /s. If momentum were conserved, its final velocity would be 2.5 m/s. However, I do not really understand this. According to Newton's First Law of Motion, an object will remain in equilibrium unless acted on by an external force. The cart is apparently instantaneously decelerated to 2.5 m/s. How is this possible? What is the external force applied on the cart?

If the cart remained the same velocity (5 m/s before and after the weight was added), then conservation of momentum wouldn't hold.

Any help and insight would be greatly appreciated. It might just be that I don't really understand the laws of motion and momentum. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You would view this as an inelastic collision. Yes, momentum is conserved. The collision will occur over some amount of time giving you what's called an impulse. force = momentum/time. So, the force between the box and cart acts over some delta time. Equal and opposite means force on box and cart is the same. Since both forces act over the same amount of time, box and cart change momentum by the same amount. force*(delta time) = delta momentum. All we see though is the delta momentum. The specific force and time are unknown in general, and are specific to the properties of the two objects and how they interact (ie large force/small time, small force large time). However, it is important for things like car crashes. If the impact time is small, that means the force is large, which means the people inside the car (or the cart) will probably die. This gives you ways to engineer objects so collisions are "safe".
 
Oh, okay, thanks Longstreet, now I understand. If we assume that the weight is set (not thrown) on the cart, we could say that there is an inelastic collision occurring with the initial velocity of the weight being negligibly small (giving it a negligibly small initial momentum).

Pi = Pf
Pci + Pwi = P(c+w)f
(1 kg)(5 m/s) + 0 = (x m/s)(2 kg)
x = 2.5 m/s

It also makes sense force-wise, the cart is putting force on the weight, speeding the weight up. Meanwhile, the weight is putting an equal and opposite force on the cart, slowing the cart down.

However, if we hadn't set the weight down on the cart, but rather first accelerated it to the same speed as the cart and then set it down, it wouldn't change the final velocity.

Again, thanks for clearing that up.
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top