Momentum conversion drive possible ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Johno
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drive Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of braking a magnet using a coil in a propulsion system, with the aim of reusing the magnet after it has been accelerated. Participants argue that such a method would violate the conservation of momentum, ultimately negating any propulsion gained. The concept of capturing the magnet weight after braking is deemed impractical, as it would result in braking the entire vessel instead. The thread concludes with a reminder that discussions on reactionless drives are prohibited, leading to its closure. Overall, the proposed system is not viable within the laws of physics.
Johno
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello!

Would it be possible to brake a magnet by means of short circuiting a coil placed at the end of a plastic tube where the magnet has been accelerated in ? Is there a conversion of magnet speed to electric current/energy inside the braking coil ? It is thaught for reusing the projectile that is used for propelling forward by means of fireing it rearward.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. Reactionless drives violate conservation of momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and etotheipi
You can brake a magnet again, perfectly cancelling whatever propulsion you might have gained from it before. That's a very elaborate scheme to heat the environment with no other effect. What is the goal?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
The goal is a propulsion system by means of throwing away a magnet weight and capturing this magnet weight agin after braking it hopefully without braking the whole wessel. ... maybe the coil energy could be recuperated and would not be lost.
 
See post #2.
 
Johno said:
The goal is a propulsion system by means of throwing away a magnet weight and capturing this magnet weight agin after braking it hopefully without braking the whole wessel
Sorry, can’t be done. You can’t get around conservation of momentum here. No matter how cleverly you arrange your coils and electric currents, you will always find that you end up braking the entire vessel so you don’t get any propulsion.

The forum rules do not allow discussion of reactionless drives, so this thread is closed.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top