Momentum-impulse vs. rectilinear motion equations

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 5K views
cipotilla
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Here we are again...We have apully system as seen on page 1 of the attachment. I tried using the rectilinear motion equations, assuming a=constant, but the book's solution used the momentum-impulse equations and got a different answer.

I don't understand why my approach is incorrect... Thanks.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Nothing wrong with using kinematics with constant acceleration. But how did you solve for the acceleration?
 
I just assumed the acceleration was gravity...I'm guessing there's something wrong with that assumption...but I don't know what...
 
Its not gravity because its not free falling. I can't believe I made that mistake. I would have to use Sum of forces=ma and find the acceleration if i wanted to use kinematics, right?
 
The "acceleration due to gravity" applies to a freely falling object--where the only force acting is gravity. But these objects are attached to ropes and pulleys--they are not freely falling! Solve for the acceleration like in any other pulley problem.
 
cipotilla said:
Its not gravity because its not free falling. I can't believe I made that mistake. I would have to use Sum of forces=ma and find the acceleration if i wanted to use kinematics, right?
Exactly. (I knew you'd snap out of it. :smile: )