Momentum Operator Construction

pzona
Messages
234
Reaction score
0
Quick question about how Schrodinger constructed the momentum operator. I understand that \widehat{H} in the wave equation is the sum of the kinetic and potential operators, using the form H=T+V. The kinetic energy can be expressed by T=p^2/2m, and that's the last part I can follow. Most sources then give the momentum operator as a "substitution" which gives p \rightarrow i\hbar\nabla. I have absolutely no idea where this comes from (I've yet to take a formal math class on anything beyond basic calculus, maybe this is the problem), could anyone provide some information on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\hat{\mathbf{p}} = -i \hbar \nabla.
Actually, it comes from the properties of Fourier transform, so
\overline{F(x,y,z)} = \int F(x,y,z) |\psi(x,y,z)|^2 dxdydz = \int \psi^{*}(x,y,z) F(x,y,z) \psi(x,y,z)dxdydz

\overline{F(p_x,p_y,p_z)} = \int F(p_x,p_y,p_z) |c(p_x,p_y,p_z)|^2 dp_xdp_ydp_z = \int c^{*}(p_x,p_y,p_z) F(p_x,p_y,p_z) c(p_x,p_y,p_z)dp_xdp_ydp_z
where c(p_x,p_y,p_z) is the amplitude of de Broglie wave which has momentum \mathbf{p}(p_x, p_y, p_z)
can be generalized in case of entire rational function F(x,y,z) (i.e., for example F(p_x) = \sum_n a_n p_x^n) and above equations becomes:

\overline{F(x,y,z)} = \int c^{*}(p_x,p_y,p_z) F \left(i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial p_x}, i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial p_y},i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial p_z} \right) c(p_x,p_y,p_z)dp_xdp_ydp_z.

\overline{F(p_x,p_y,p_z)} = \int \psi^{*}(x,y,z) F \left(-i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x},-i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial y},-i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \right) \psi(x,y,z)dxdydz
Consider F(p_x, p_y,p_z)=p_x. Then,
\overline{p_x}= \int \psi^{*}(x,y,z) \left( -i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \right) \psi(x,y,z) dxdydz
In other words
\hat{p_x} = -ih \frac{\partial}{\partial x}
 
Alright, thanks a lot, that makes a little more sense now. I'm probably not at the level of mathematical skill I would need to be at to derive that on my own, but I can follow most of your steps. It's so interesting how hbar seems to keep coming up, even in the Fourier transformation. Thanks a lot, that was very helpful
 
Hbar comes from de Brogile wave :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top