Momentum-Work: Confused about KE = 1/2mv2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zula110100100
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the kinetic energy formula KE = 1/2mv² and its relationship to momentum and work. The user attempts to derive the kinetic energy equation from work and momentum principles but struggles with the integration of average velocity and initial conditions. It is clarified that when calculating work, the average velocity must be considered, especially when acceleration is involved. The final speed in the kinetic energy equation is crucial, as it reflects the object's state after work is done. Understanding these concepts helps reconcile the equations and highlights the importance of initial conditions in physics calculations.
Zula110100100
Messages
250
Reaction score
0
I am confused about the KE = 1/2mv2

I was able to get v2=2as from it, by removing mass from each side you get as = 1/2v2 then rearrange, but I was trying to relate momentum and work in my head, and since p = mv than KE = 1/2 p * v

but starting with Work = F * s

and since s = vt

Work = F*vt

then solve for time t = W/Fv

and p = mv
v = at
so p = mat

so p = Ft(assuming no original momentum)

substitute for t and

p = FW/Fv

p = W/v

W = pv

W = mv2

So what am I doing wrong? becuase mv2 does not equals 1/2mv2

I was thinking maybe because I am not using t0 and v0, but it doesn't seem like that's it, it seems the only way is with the 2as but it should tie back in somewhere...

and even working backwards from KE = 1/2mv2
Fvt = 1/2pv
devide by V and multiply by 2
and p = 2 F*t
p = 2 m*a*t
p = 2 mv
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zula110100100 said:
and since s = vt
Since the speed is not constant, you need to use the average velocity when calculating distance. In the KE formula, the v is the final speed.
 
Oh, okay, so it kinda has to do with not using v0[\SUB]...and the like
 
Zula110100100 said:
Oh, okay, so it kinda has to do with not using v0[\SUB]...and the like

Right. For the simple case of a constant force applied to an object initially at rest (v0 = 0), we'll have vave = v/2. So:
W = F*s = F*v/2*t = (F*t)*v/2 = (mv)*v/2 = 1/2mv2. As expected.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top