Monochromators and the physics behind them

  • Thread starter Thread starter Valce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
A user seeks a textbook focused on monochromators and their underlying physics, having already started a general Photonics book. The discussion suggests that while optics textbooks may cover monochromators, the user might need more specific resources. There is a debate on whether to focus on wave optics or electromagnetic (EM) optics for understanding monochromators, with opinions varying on the necessity of EM for topics like refraction and dispersion. Some argue that wave optics suffices for basic understanding, while others contend that a deeper exploration into refraction mechanisms may require EM knowledge. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards wave optics being adequate for most applications related to monochromators.
Valce
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hey! I'm looking for a textbook that talks about monochromators and the physics behind them to some extent. I've already started a general Photonics book along with some supplements, but my prof tells me I'll need to get something more specific to monochromators as well.

Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's the intro wikipedia page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monochromator

Not sure about textbooks -- seems like some optics books would cover them. I'm going to move this thread from EE to the General Physics forum to get some better feedback for you.
 
Thanks! By the way, should I be focusing more on wave or electromagnetic optics to understand how a monochromator works?
 
Valce said:
Thanks! By the way, should I be focusing more on wave or electromagnetic optics to understand how a monochromator works?

Sorry, I don't understand the question. What do you mean by wave versus EM optics?
 
It's a simple wave effect, so EM is unnecessary.
 
cesiumfrog said:
It's a simple wave effect, so EM is unnecessary.
Well, actually, it depends: if he wants to go deep into refraction and dispersion mechanisms (in the case the monochromator uses a prism an not a diffractio grating to separate the wavelenght), he needs EM too.
 
lightarrow said:
Well, actually, it depends: if he wants to go deep into refraction and dispersion mechanisms (in the case the monochromator uses a prism an not a diffractio grating to separate the wavelenght), he needs EM too.

Wave optics is sufficient for refraction if the wave speed in each medium is known. (How is dispersion supposed to be relevant for a monochromator?) If he wants to go deeper (i.e., determine the wave speed for himself) he'll basically need QM, not just EM. EM alone might be able to give a deeper understanding of a grating, maybe. Still, it'd be silly to delve so far to understand something that is common to all classical wave systems, and in no way specific to electromagnetism. (In fact it's worse than that, since whatever is learned in that way can no longer be immediately applied to other common types of waves.)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
102
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top