Monopolist Profit Maximization with Elasticity Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter econ67
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The monopolist's demand function is y=96-4p, with total costs represented as c=10y. The discussion focuses on deriving the marginal cost and marginal revenue functions, with attempts made to calculate these values. Marginal revenue was calculated as MR = -24 + p, while the marginal cost was derived as 10/-4. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity on the definitions and mathematical representations of marginal cost and marginal revenue. Understanding these concepts is crucial for determining the profit-maximizing output and price for the monopolist.
econ67
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A monopolist faces demand y=96-4p and has total costs c=10y.
a) derive the marginal cost and marginal revenue functions.
b) what is the profit-maximizing output and price for this monopolist?
c) Suppose p=10 and MR=5, calculate the elasticit.

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org


Do you know the definition of marginal cost and marginal revenue?
 


I have an idea of what they mean, but I am having a hard time finding them for this problem.
 


So what do they mean? Show us what attempts have you made to figure them out.
 


What i did to find the marginal revenue was divide the derivative of the total revenue by the derivative of the quantity function. d(96p-4p^2)/d(96-4p)=96-4p/-4=-24+p. Thats what i got for the marginal revenue.

For the marginal cost, i divided the derivative of the cost function by the derivative of the quantity function. 10/-4 was the result i got for the marginal cost function.
 


Can you state in words what marginal cost is and what marginal revenue is? I can't tell if you don't have a clear concept of what those quantities are or if you just don't know how to represent them mathematically.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top