Monte-Carlo simulation for a matrix model

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a Monte-Carlo simulation for a matrix model with a Lagrangian that includes Yang-Mills and Chern-Simons terms. The author observes that the system initially starts with small values for both terms, but over time, they increase significantly, leading to an equilibrium state with higher energy. This behavior raises questions about whether it is expected or indicative of a potential issue in the simulation process. Further exploration reveals that this phenomenon may indeed represent the proper equilibrium state for such systems simulated using Monte-Carlo methods. The findings suggest that larger energy states can still yield a stable equilibrium despite the apparent contradictions in the Lagrangian values.
mvachovski
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello there,

I am writing a Monte-Carlo simulation for a matrix model with a Lagrangian consisting
of two parts - Yang-Mills and Chern-Simons type terms. As I am accepting/rejecting
new states with probability P=min{1, dL}, where dL is the change of the lagrangian.

But then there is something weird. When I plot the values of the YM and CS terms as functions
of the Monte-Carlo time, it seems that the system "starts" in a state that both terms are small,
but after some time the terms become significantly bigger and there is "the equilibrium"
And this effect is because the YM and CS terms have such sings that big values of them cancel
and still can produce a small value for the Lagrangian, but this would simply mean that the equilibrium
of the system is a state with a bigger energy! Is this behavior proper/expected or I am doing
something wrong?

Thanks in advance

P.S. I'm uploading the plot of the YM and CS over Monte-Carlo time.
 

Attachments

  • YM_and_CS.png
    YM_and_CS.png
    9.9 KB · Views: 457
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi all,

For those which could encounter the same situation.
As I learned a bit more about the model it seems, that really should be the equilibrium
state of the system. So for generic system which is simulated by Monte-Carlo methods
this could happen.

Cheers
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top