Moon Destruction: What Would Happen to Earth?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cybergold101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon
AI Thread Summary
If the Moon were destroyed by an asteroid, Earth would face catastrophic consequences, including increased rotation speed due to angular momentum transfer and potential impacts from lunar debris. The Earth could experience multiple asteroid collisions, possibly leading to mass extinctions and climate shifts akin to the events that killed the dinosaurs. In a scenario where the Moon was removed cleanly, Earth's orbit would be slightly altered, but its rotation would remain unaffected. The loss of the Moon would significantly reduce tidal amplitudes, leading to a more stable tidal cycle influenced solely by the Sun. Additionally, the removal of the Moon could impact Earth's orbital eccentricity and energy, causing subtle changes in its path around the Sun.
cybergold101
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
...was destroyed by an asteroid which was destined for Earth? Where would that leave Earth? What would happen to Earth orbit? Rotation?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
If that happen,the rotation of the Earth will faster !due to the angular momentum of the lunar system transfer to the Earth !
 
Earth would be hit by chunks of the moon leaving it full or craters and depending on the size of the chunks of the moon and parts of the asteroid that hit the moon that hit the earth, the Earth itself would probably expirence multiple asteroids hitting the Earth with equal or greater size than the one that hit the Earth killing the dinosaurs most likely sending us into another ice age due to the climate change caused by the impact. That is just the after effect but the problems that the asteroids would cause as soon as they hit the Earth would be astronomical and on a global scale most likely causing the deaths of millions.
 
If the moon was somehow cleanly removed without showering the Earth with fragments, then this would have a slight effect on the Earth's orbit but no immediate effect on its rotation. The effect on the Earth's orbit can be understood by considering the Earth and moon as a combined rotating system; if the moon is suddenly removed, the overall momentum of that system is changed by the momentum of the moon in its orbit around the Earth.

Using figures from the internet, I make it that the mass of the moon is very roughly about 1/80th of that of the Earth, and the relative velocity of the moon in its orbit about the Earth is about 1/30th of that of the Earth about the sun, so the fractional change in momentum of the Earth in its orbit would be about 1/(80*30) = 1/2400. If the change in momentum were aligned forward or backwards along the orbit to maximize the effect on the velocity, then the fractional change in kinetic energy in the orbit would be proportional to the square of this, that is around 1 part in 6 million.

Another effect of losing the moon would be that ocean tides would be much smaller (something like only 1/3 of the amplitude), as they would only be due to the sun. They would also be locked into a repeating daily cycle with some variations over a yearly cycle instead of changing in time of day and amplitude over a monthly cycle.

The reduction in the tides would also mean in the very long term that the rate of slowing of the Earth's rotation would be reduced.
 
Hmmm, Is your theory taking into account the removal of the Earth moon barycenter? Wouldn't the Angular momentum about the pre-existing BC be transferred as pure kinetic energy depending on when the moon was removed? Wouldn't this somewhat alter the eccentricity of Earth's sun orbit?? Just curious.
 
BosonJaw said:
Hmmm, Is your theory taking into account the removal of the Earth moon barycenter? Wouldn't the Angular momentum about the pre-existing BC be transferred as pure kinetic energy depending on when the moon was removed? Wouldn't this somewhat alter the eccentricity of Earth's sun orbit?? Just curious.

Not angular momentum, but linear momentum due to the moon's orbit around the Earth. I've assumed as an approximation that its orbit is about the center of the Earth, not about the barycenter of the Earth/moon system which is nearer the Earth's surface, hence the word "roughly". The effect does depend on the point in the orbit at which the moon was removed, and could alter both the eccentricity and overall energy of the orbit slightly.

Another way to look at it is that the Earth wobbles slightly in its orbit around the sun because of the moon pulling on it. If the moon is suddenly removed, the current direction of the wobble effectively becomes an impulsive change affecting the overall orbit (mainly causing about half of it to be higher and half of it to be lower than before, but also causing a slight change in the overall energy).
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top