I Moon revolution period 27.32, but got 27.53 from equation?

AI Thread Summary
The calculation for the Moon's revolution period typically yields 27.53 days using the formula T = sqrt(4π^2 * R^3/(GM)), based on the distance from Earth and the mass of the Earth. However, the expected value is 27.32 days, leading to questions about potential discrepancies. Factors such as the elliptical nature of the Moon's orbit and the Earth's movement during the Moon's revolution may contribute to this difference. Adjusting the formula to include the Moon's mass results in a period of 27.36 days, which is closer but still not exact. The discussion highlights the complexity of orbital mechanics and the influence of multiple factors on calculated periods.
cnnn
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I'm trying to calculate Moon revolution period but always got 27.53 instead of 27.32.
G = 6.674e-11 (m^3 kg^-1 s^-2)
M = 5.9724e24 (kg) from http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/moonfact.html
R = 384400000 (m) Earth Moon distance

From 4π^2 * R^3 = GM*T^2,
got moon revolution period T = sqrt(4π^2 * R^3/(GM))

Earth day in seconds = 23*60*60 + 56*60 + 4
so moon revolution period in Earth day = 27.53

Why it is not 27.32? Is it because the orbit is not circular? But period should be same if R is the semi major axis or the orbit.

If I revise the formula and consider Moon gravitational force to the Earth,
let m be the mass of Moon
T = sqrt(4π^2 * R^3/(G(M+m)))
the moon revolution period in Earth day = 27.36, a bit closer but still some error (rounding error?)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Consider how far the Earth revolves in the lunar month?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top