MHB More Infinite Series Problems to Solve

AI Thread Summary
The discussion presents several infinite series problems, including \( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^4} \) and \( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(n+1) \cdot (n+1)!}{(n+5)!} \). The first series is evaluated to yield \( \zeta(4) = \frac{\pi^4}{90} \), utilizing the Bernoulli number \( B_4 \). The second series is approached through partial fractions and limits, ultimately converging to \( \frac{7}{360} \). Various methods, including Fourier theory and the Gamma function, are discussed for solving these series. The thread emphasizes the diverse techniques available for tackling infinite series problems.
DrunkenOldFool
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
It looks like you guys love to solve infinite series problems. Here are a few more

\( \displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^4}\)

\( \displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(n+1) \cdot (n+1)!}{(n+5)!}\)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
\( \displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^4}\)

\( \displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^4}=\zeta(4)=(-1)^2 \frac{B_4 (2\pi)^{4}}{2 \times 4!}=\frac{\pi^4}{90}\)

where $B_4$ is a Bernoulli Number.
 
DrunkenOldFool said:
\( \displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(n+1) \cdot (n+1)!}{(n+5)!}\)
$\displaystyle \sum_{ n \ge 1}\frac{(n+1)(n+1)!}{(n+5)!} = \lim_{ k \to \infty}\sum_{1 \le n \le k}\frac{(n+1)(n+1)!}{(n+5)(n+4)(n+3)(n+2)(n+1)!} = \lim_{ k \to \infty}\sum_{1 \le n \le k}\frac{(n+1)}{(n+5)(n+4)(n+3)(n+2)}$

By writing the summand in the partial fractions form and denoting the partial sum by $S_{k}$, we find that$\begin{aligned} S_{k} = \frac{2}{3}\sum_{0 \le n \le k}\frac{1}{n+5}-\frac{3}{2}\sum_{0 \le n \le k}\frac{1}{n+4}+\sum_{0 \le n \le k}\frac{1}{n+3}-\frac{1}{6}\sum_{0 \le n \le k}\frac{1}{n+2}\end{aligned}$Mapping $n \mapsto n-1$ (replacing $n$ with $n-1$ basically) for the first and the third sum then we find$\begin{aligned} S_{k} & = \frac{2}{3}\sum_{1 \le n-1 \le k}\frac{1}{n+4}-\frac{3}{2}\sum_{1 \le n \le k}\frac{1}{n+4}+\sum_{1 \le n-1 \le k}\frac{1}{n+2}-\frac{1}{6}\sum_{1 \le n \le k}\frac{1}{n+2} \\& = \frac{2}{3}\sum_{2 \le n \le k+1}\frac{1}{n+4}-\frac{3}{2}\sum_{1 \le n \le k}\frac{1}{n+4}+\sum_{2 \le n \le k+1}\frac{1}{n+2}-\frac{1}{6}\sum_{1 \le n \le k}\frac{1}{n+2} \\& = \frac{2}{3(k+4)}-\frac{2}{15}+\frac{2}{3} \sum_{1 \le n \le k}\frac{1}{n+4}-\frac{3}{2}\sum_{1 \le n \le k}\frac{1}{n+4}+\frac{1}{k+3}-\frac{1}{3}+\sum_{1 \le n \le k}\frac{1}{n+2}-\frac{1}{6}\sum_{1 \le n \le k}\frac{1}{n+2} \\& = \frac{2}{3(k+4)}+\frac{1}{k+3}-\frac{7}{15}-\frac{5}{6}\sum_{1 \le n \le k}\frac{1}{n+4}+\frac{5}{6}\sum_{1 \le n \le k}\frac{1}{n+2} \\& = \frac{2}{3(k+4)}+\frac{1}{k+3}-\frac{7}{15}-\frac{5}{6}\sum_{1 \le n-2 \le k}\frac{1}{n+2}+\frac{5}{6}\sum_{1 \le n \le k}\frac{1}{n+2} \\& = \frac{2}{3(k+4)}+\frac{1}{k+3}-\frac{7}{15}-\frac{5}{6}\sum_{3 \le n \le k+2}\frac{1}{n+2}+\frac{5}{6}\sum_{1 \le n \le k}\frac{1}{n+2} \\& = \frac{2}{3(k+4)}+\frac{1}{k+3}-\frac{7}{15}+\frac{35}{72}-\frac{5}{6(k+4)}-\frac{5}{6(k+3)}-\frac{5}{6}\sum_{1 \le n \le k}\frac{1}{n+2}+\frac{5}{6}\sum_{1 \le n \le k}\frac{1}{n+2} \\& = \frac{2}{3(k+4)}+\frac{1}{k+3}-\frac{5}{6(k+4)}-\frac{5}{6(k+3)}+\frac{7}{360}\end{aligned}$Where we of coursed mapped $n \mapsto n-2$ for the sum on the left in the fifth line. Now it's obvious that $\displaystyle \lim_{ k \to \infty}S_{k} = \frac{7}{360}$ and that's value of your sum.
 
Last edited:
sbhatnagar said:
\( \displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^4}=\zeta(4)=(-1)^2 \frac{B_4 (2\pi)^{4}}{2 \times 4!}=\frac{\pi^4}{90}\)

where $B_4$ is a Bernoulli Number.
Another way to do this is to use Fourier theory on the function $f(x)=x^2\;\;(x\in[-\pi,\pi])$. Its Fourier coefficients are given by $\hat{f}(0)=\pi^2/3$, $\hat{f}(n) = 2(-1)^n/n^2\;(n\ne0).$ The result then follows by applying Parseval's theorem.
 
Whenever I see factorials, I take advantage of the Gamma and Beta function, so $\displaystyle\frac{(n+1)(n+1)!}{(n+5)!}=\frac{1}{\Gamma (4)}\cdot \frac{(n+1)\Gamma (n+2)\Gamma (4)}{\Gamma (n+6)}=\frac{n+1}{\Gamma (4)}\cdot \beta (n,4)
,$ so the series becomes $\displaystyle\frac{1}{\Gamma (4)}\sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty }{(n+1)\int_{0}^{1}{{{t}^{n+1}}{{(1-t)}^{3}}\,dt}}=\frac{1}{\Gamma (4)}\int_{0}^{1}{t{{(1-t)}^{3}}\sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty }{(n+1){{t}^{n}}}\,dt}$ and then the series equals $\displaystyle\frac{1}{\Gamma (4)}\int_{0}^{1}{t\left( (1-t)-{{(1-t)}^{3}} \right)\,dt}$ which achieves the same value as shown.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top