MOSFET output current limited by Inductor Saturation current?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the impact of inductor saturation current on the output current of a MOSFET in a buck converter circuit. Participants explore the implications of exceeding saturation current, potential damage to components, and the design considerations necessary to prevent failures in power regulation applications.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that exceeding the inductor's saturation current can lead to rapid increases in MOSFET current, potentially causing damage.
  • Questions arise regarding whether damage would also occur to the inductor or bulk output capacitors in such scenarios.
  • There is a call for a deeper understanding of how to model a real inductor and the changes in impedance when saturation current is exceeded.
  • Participants discuss the importance of sizing considerations for components in a DC-DC converter design and the need for current limiting schemes.
  • One participant notes that exceeding saturation results in the inductor losing inductance, which could affect circuit performance.
  • Concerns are raised about the thermal limits of the inductor and MOSFET under high current conditions, with calculations suggested to assess potential damage.
  • Discussion includes the behavior of the circuit under load steps from high-performance processors, highlighting the risks associated with inadequate design in power delivery systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that exceeding the saturation current can lead to damage, particularly to the MOSFET. However, there is no consensus on the specifics of component interactions, the modeling of inductors, or the adequacy of current limiting measures in various designs.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the exact behavior of components under saturation conditions and the implications for circuit design. There are references to specific component ratings and configurations, but no definitive conclusions are reached about the best practices for preventing damage.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for engineers and designers involved in power electronics, particularly those working with DC-DC converters and high-performance computing applications.

ssb2245
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
So the MOSFET's output current in a simple buck converter with a PWm a driver and a MOSFET and LC circuit. The Inductor's saturation or Irms current limits the MOSFET's current output, correct? I heard that if it exceeds saturation current that the MOSFETs could be damaged.

is this true?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes it is true. Once the inductor saturates the mosfet current will increase very rapidly which could damage it.
 
it will damage the MOSFET, correct?

Will there be any damage to the inductor or the bulk output capacitors?
 
ssb2245 said:
So the MOSFET's output current in a simple buck converter with a PWm a driver and a MOSFET and LC circuit. The Inductor's saturation or Irms current limits the MOSFET's current output, correct? I heard that if it exceeds saturation current that the MOSFETs could be damaged.

is this true?

Thanks

uart said:
Yes it is true. Once the inductor saturates the mosfet current will increase very rapidly which could damage it.

ssb2245 said:
it will damage the MOSFET, correct?

Will there be any damage to the inductor or the bulk output capacitors?

We need to step back and talk more about fundamentals here, IMO.

How do you model an real inductor; with what circuit components? (What series components? We don't need to consider parallel winding capacitance for your present question)

And given that model, how does the model's impedance change when the current exceeds the saturation current? And is it usually a sharp knee or a soft knee?

And why would the MOSFET or Bipolar high-side switch be damaged? What sizing considerations go into each component in a DC-DC converter's design? And what kind of current limiting schemes should you consider in your design? Nothing should get damaged if the output of your DC-DC gets shorted out...
 
berkeman said:
We need to step back and talk more about fundamentals here, IMO.

How do you model an real inductor; with what circuit components? (What series components? We don't need to consider parallel winding capacitance for your present question)

And given that model, how does the model's impedance change when the current exceeds the saturation current? And is it usually a sharp knee or a soft knee?

And why would the MOSFET or Bipolar high-side switch be damaged? What sizing considerations go into each component in a DC-DC converter's design? And what kind of current limiting schemes should you consider in your design? Nothing should get damaged if the output of your DC-DC gets shorted out...

I am just trying to analyze a circuit. I am not at that level yet for some of your questions. But I read that once saturation point is exceeded that the inductor losses inductance as the current rises significantly.

Each phase, or driver with one pari of high-side and pair of low-side FET outputs to an inductor. The MOSFETs can output 40A, has Rdson of 3.4mOhm and output capacitance of 7.7nF. Come in a canPAK package. THere are 4 MOSFETs and one driver per phase along with a single inductor for both pairs of MOSFETs, i know its an odd design. Totally overkill considering the current rating of the Inductor.

but the inductor has a saturation current of 28A and Irms of 28A as well. Metal alloy.
DRC is 0.0012ohm typical and 0.0014 with 0.68uH inductance.

the PWM probably has current limiting but I have no idea what it is set too.

I just want to know if there is was way that the inductor limits the current output, in this case would a good engineer design the circuit so that current is limited at 28A.

I want to know, or better understand how it is going to work if let's say there is NO current limiting and the MOSFETs output all together 30-40A through the inductor.
 
Wow, monster stuff!

That's a tiny resistance for the inductor. You would calculate the resistive heating for the wire in the inductor, to figure out if the inductor would actually fry with that current.
 
Wouldn't the MOSFET fry first? or what? which equation?
 
ssb2245 said:
Wouldn't the MOSFET fry first? or what? which equation?

You just have to calculate the temperature rise of each, and see if that would exceed the damage threshold for the device.

And where is all this current going? If the inductor saturates, it's not likely that the DC-DC can stay in regulation. Other things may fry too...
 
The current will go to the bulk output capacitor bank with something like 5000uF-9000uF, then to high frequency ceramic caps and then to the CPU(processor).

Some of the Intel processors, all of the i7 900 series have an 100A load step from idle to load. We overclock which means we take 2.8ghz processors to 4 or 5 or 6 or 7ghz depending on the cooling.

The VRM (voltage regulator module) in question have 16 pairs of these caps, but only 8 of these inductors, which is weird, usually pair of high and low side MOSFETs have their own inductor, but this VRM has a weakness, and I want people to be informed.

In our community we had very high end $600 dollar GPUs very new ones that would have their 35A DriverMOSFETs or 30A low Rdson MOSFETs blow up because of their inductors, that was the theory of why.

Our processors have a 130watt TDP, which is their thermal spec, so they pull about 105watts and then loss a bunch to efficiency. but the GPUs have 200-300 watt TDPs.

Motherboards now have very sophisticated SMPS. Some have 24 phase designs, some 8 some even as little at 6, and everywhere in between. The top end GPUs I have seen one with 12 phases and the ones blowing up have 5.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
407
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K