Most Light Through Polarizing Filters: 0, 45, 90

  • Thread starter Thread starter solars
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Filters
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining which combination of polarizing filters allows the most light to pass through, specifically analyzing angles such as 0, 45, and 90 degrees. Participants emphasize that the difference between the angles of the filters is crucial for maximizing light transmission. Practical experiments demonstrate that placing a third filter at a 45-degree angle between two filters set at 90 degrees allows light to pass through, contradicting the expectation of complete opacity. The conversation also touches on the application of formulas involving cosine squared values to calculate light intensity. Ultimately, the insights gained could be beneficial for selling camera accessories.
solars
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Which combo of polarizing filters allows most light to pass through? Each orientation is given with respect to vertical
unit of following values given are angles:
1. 0, 45, 90
2. 30, 60, 90
3. 180, 0, 180
4. 90, 135, 180
5. 10,20,100

I tried by using the formulas:
I1=0.5Inought
I2=I1*cos^2(theta)
I3=I2*cos^2(theta)

so bascially I multiplied cos^2(theta1) *cos^2(theta2) *cos^2(theta3) and chose the biggest value. Am I doing this right? Can I just plug in the angles given directly or do I have to subtract something from them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi solars! :smile:

Isn't it the difference between the angles that matters?
 
I've done this experiment for real (when I worked in a camera store).

It's really cool.

Put 2 filters together at 90 degrees to each other. Completely opaque.
Slip a 3rd one between them at a 45 degree angle. Suddenly, you can see through all three!


Manager says "How does that help us sell more accessories?"
 
oh so it should be 3 then? thanks for the help guys =)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top