Most probable radii in hydrogen ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter khurram usman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydrogen
khurram usman
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
most probable radii in hydrogen...?

i just started studying quantum mechanics in college...i was told that according to quantum theory the most probable radii of 1s 2s and 3s in hydrogen are respectively a 6a and 11a, where a=bohrs radius for 1st shell
sir told me that we get these values by solving equations for probability...something about differentiating it and then putting it equal to 0
can anyone please provide me any link where these equations and hopefully more numerical problems are solved? i googled this but could not find anything understandable...so please provide something for starters
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Yes, just like with everyday functions we play with in calculus, if you want to find an extrema, you have to differentiate the function and set that equal to zero and solve. For the hydrogen atom, it is no different. One uses the probability density function and solves for the most probable radius. One can also solve for the "expectation value" or where one would find the electron in the hydrogen if probed many times. In general these are not the same value. I don't have a link for you, sorry... but this is treated commonly in most intro QM books, like Griffiths.

Good luck.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top