Motion of 2 masses connected by a rod to a pendulum

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the equilibrium of a system consisting of two masses connected by a massless rod, suspended from a pendulum. Participants emphasize the importance of considering forces and torques, highlighting that tensions in the rod do not contribute to equilibrium. The equilibrium condition is suggested to be achievable only when the pendulum is vertical or in a specific dynamic state. Additionally, the symmetry of the system allows for simplifications in deriving equations without relying on torques. Ultimately, the consensus is that the system's balance is maintained regardless of the joint's position on the lower rod, as long as the pendulum remains vertical.
Jenny Physics
Messages
111
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Find the equation of motion for the system of two masses connected by a massless rod hanging from a pendulum swinging from left to right and back. Use Newton's second law in terms of forces (not in terms of torques).
Relevant Equations
x and y forces
balance.png

I am not sure which other forces I should consider besides those 3. I cannot consider tensions due to the massless rod on the masses since those will not add up to zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jenny Physics said:
Homework Statement:: Find the equilibrium of forces condition for the system of two masses connected by a massless rod hanging from a pendulum.
Homework Equations:: x and y equilibrium of forces

View attachment 255197
I am not sure which other forces I should consider besides those 3. I cannot consider tensions due to the massless rod on the masses since those will not add up to zero.
Is the problem statement exactly as given to you?
Did the diagram come with it or is that your own interpretation?
It is hard to see how it could be in equilibrium unless the pendulum is vertical... unless it is a dynamic equilibrium, e.g. with the pendulum describing a cone about the vertical.
 
  • Like
Likes Jenny Physics
haruspex said:
Is the problem statement exactly as given to you?
Did the diagram come with it or is that your own interpretation?
It is hard to see how it could be in equilibrium unless the pendulum is vertical... unless it is a dynamic equilibrium, e.g. with the pendulum describing a cone about the vertical.
You are right, this was a misunderstanding. I edited the question.
 
Jenny Physics said:
You are right, this was a misunderstanding. I edited the question.
I assume the upper rod joins the lower rod at its mid point.
In principle, you would use torque there to figure out the equations, but by symmetry you don't need to. Think whether the behaviour of the upper rod depends at all on the length of the lower rod. What difference would it make to that if it were shrunk to zero?
 
  • Like
Likes Jenny Physics
haruspex said:
I assume the upper rod joins the lower rod at its mid point.
In principle, you would use torque there to figure out the equations, but by symmetry you don't need to. Think whether the behaviour of the upper rod depends at all on the length of the lower rod. What difference would it make to that if it were shrunk to zero?
It doesn't depend on the length of the lower rod only because of the symmetry. But what if the pendulum were not attached right at the middle of the lower rod? How could I derive the equations without using torques?
 
Jenny Physics said:
It doesn't depend on the length of the lower rod only because of the symmetry. But what if the pendulum were not attached right at the middle of the lower rod? How could I derive the equations without using torques?
It is provably impossible.
Consider the pendulum rod vertical and the other horizontal, all stationary. Forces alone say all is in balance, regardless where the joint is.
 
  • Like
Likes Jenny Physics
If have close pipe system with water inside pressurized at P1= 200 000Pa absolute, density 1000kg/m3, wider pipe diameter=2cm, contraction pipe diameter=1.49cm, that is contraction area ratio A1/A2=1.8 a) If water is stationary(pump OFF) and if I drill a hole anywhere at pipe, water will leak out, because pressure(200kPa) inside is higher than atmospheric pressure (101 325Pa). b)If I turn on pump and water start flowing with with v1=10m/s in A1 wider section, from Bernoulli equation I...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
784
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K