Motorcycle Catches a Car (Acceleration)

AI Thread Summary
A motorcycle starts 27 meters behind a car traveling at a constant speed, initially matching the car's speed. When the motorcycle accelerates, it eventually reaches a speed that is twice that of the car. The discussion focuses on calculating the distance the motorcycle travels while accelerating until it catches up with the car. Key equations involve the relationship between initial speed, acceleration, and time to close the gap. The final calculations lead to a solution for the distance traveled by the motorcycle during this acceleration phase.
Kalie
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
A motorcycle is 27 m behind a car that is traveling at constant speed on a straightaway. Initially, the car and the motorcycle are both traveling at the same speed, . At some time , the motorcycle starts to accelerate at a rate of . By the time the motorcycle catches up with the car, at time , it is traveling at twice the car's speed.

I solved all of the parts except for the last one

How far did the motorcycle travel from the moment when it starts to accelerate (at time ) until it catches up with the car (at time )?

The problem is I don't know how to start it

I found that Vcar= 18m/s and t2-tl=3s

and so Vmoto=36m/s

but i don't know what is wrong...

please help I have been working on this problem for about 4 hours...I think I'm going to burst:cry:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the motorcycle we have from v = u + at that

t_c = \frac{v_o}{a}

where tc is the time to close the gap and vo is the intial speed of the two. Then the distance the motorcycle traveled until it caught up with the car is given by

v_ot_c + 0.5a{t_c}^2 = 27 + v_ot_c

the term on the right is the gap plus the extra distance the car traveled during the time tc. This gives

\frac{{v_o}^2}{a} = 54

using the previous formula for tc. Now the distance the motorcycle traveled can be found from

v^2 = u^2 + 2as
 
Last edited:
Awesome thank you
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top