Moving equal to or faster than c

  • Thread starter Thread starter QwertyXP
  • Start date Start date
QwertyXP
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
I have a few queries regarding achieving/overcoming the speed of limit:

1. There are three spaceships X, Y and Z. X moves away from Y at 0.9c and Z moves away from Y at 0.9c in the OPPOSITE direction. Relative to X, wouldn't the speed of Z be 1.8c?

2. Has the limit "c" been physically observed or is it only theoretical? That is, have we actually tried accelerating particles and noticed that their speed always stays below c?

3. Recently, during an experiment at CERN, some scientists claimed that a certain particle was accelerated to such an extent that it moved faster than c. However, later there appeared to be some discrepancies in the data. I wasn't able to gather what was the final verdict..was the scientists' claim correct or not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Relative velocity as seen in 2 different inertial frames is also Lorentz transformed. The relative speed will be 0.9945c. Can't exceed c.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity-addition_formula
2. Yes, but in May 2012, the Gran Sasso experiments BOREXINO, ICARUS, LVD and OPERA all measured neutrino velocity with a short-pulsed beam, and obtained agreement with the speed of light.

Thankfully, cos I would have been at my wits end had the speed barrier been broken.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top