Moving Faster Than the Speed of Light? Exploring the Possibilities

In summary, according to Special Relativity, the speed of light is invariant, so a person traveling at 80% of the speed of light within a spaceship would be moving faster than the speed of light outside the spaceship. This is why it is incorrect to think that speeds add like this: V_{a/c} = V_{a/b} + V_{b/c}. The first approximation, Galilean addition of velocities, is only accurate for low speeds, and the second, relativistic addition of velocities, is more accurate.f
  • #1
1
0
I know that according to e=mc^2, it should be impossible to accelerate anything with mass to the speed of light, but what if someone is on a large spaceship moving at 80% of c, and are themselves moving at, say 20 or 30% of the speed of light within the spaceship.

According to an immobile observer, outside the spaceship wouldn't this person be moving faster than the speed of light?

Of course I know this must be wrong, but I'm wondering what the flaw in my reasoning is.
 
  • #2
Your question isn't naive. Your error is thinking that speeds add like this:

[tex]V_{a/c} = V_{a/b} + V_{b/c}[/tex]

When they really add like this:

[tex]V_{a/c} = \frac{V_{a/b} + V_{b/c}}{1 + (V_{a/b} V_{b/c})/c^2}[/tex]

The first (called Galilean addition of velocities) is only an approximation good for low speeds; the second is the more accurate relativistic addition of velocities. You'll see that speeds will never add to more than c.
 
  • #3
I know that according to e=mc^2, it should be impossible to accelerate anything with mass to the speed of light, but what if someone is on a large spaceship moving at 80% of c, and are themselves moving at, say 20 or 30% of the speed of light within the spaceship.

According to an immobile observer, outside the spaceship wouldn't this person be moving faster than the speed of light?

Of course I know this must be wrong, but I'm wondering what the flaw in my reasoning is.

This is sort of a reformulation of the classic "light flash" thought experments. No matter how you slice it, the speed of light in a given medium is STATIC. I would reach about the basics of Special Relativity, which basically takes the conundrum you're struggling with, and solves it.

This is WHY things are relative, because c is invariant. If c is the same everywhere, and if all observers have to "agree on the laws of physics", then it's SPACETIME which varies. This is how you get to Relativity in the first place.

If you hold a flashlight, and walk forward... the velocity of your motion is not added to the velocity of the light. The interval between the light reaching X target is a function of the medium and distance (geodesic followed).

EDIt: Doc Al beat me to, and probably for the best. Sorry Doc!
 

Suggested for: Moving Faster Than the Speed of Light? Exploring the Possibilities

Replies
10
Views
514
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
74
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
690
Replies
45
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
78
Views
3K
Back
Top