MS Medical Physics: Thesis or Non-thesis Option

AI Thread Summary
Choosing between a thesis and non-thesis master's in a CAMPEP-accredited medical physics program can significantly impact hireability, particularly for residency positions. While a thesis may not be crucial for jobs in community hospitals or clinics, it can enhance competitiveness in academic settings. The thesis project discussed, involving Monte Carlo simulations, lacks clinical relevance, which raises questions about its value. The individual has prior research experience from a biophysics degree but prefers clinical work. Gaining clinical training during the program may bolster employability. The current job market is competitive, prompting many graduates to pursue PhDs to improve their chances for residency. A thesis could also lead to publications, adding value to a CV, even for clinically-focused roles. Overall, the decision should consider long-term career goals, including potential residency applications and the desire for clinical practice.
Biophyz
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I am currently in a CAMPEP-accredited medical physics program. I have the option to do a thesis masters or a non-thesis masters (additional coursework). When it comes down to it, will it make a big difference in my hireabilty whether I choose to do a thesis or non-thesis masters from the same university? I do have an MS degree in biophysics (hence the username) which did involve research, so I DO have some graduate level research experience.

I am not particularly fond of research and hope to spend most of my time doing clinical work, so it seems like it wouldn't be a huge advantage to do a thesis masters.

Also, I may consider applying to a PhD program after I garner a bit of work experience.

Thanks in advance for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would it be a clinically meaningful thesis? What is the extent of your current clinical medical physics experience? Do you intend to pursue a residency position following graduation? Given the choice between additional didactic coursework and a clinically oriented research project, I would be more inclined to pursue the research.

Assuming that you are forgoing the residency for a junior physicist job (which I might reconsider if your clinical experience is limited): employers want to know that you have an appropriate degree, and having one from a CAMPEP program tells them that you've completed a reasonably thorough sequence of courses. Having a few courses beyond that might not be much of an additional selling point, but being able to intelligently discuss something clinically practical that you investigated and gained experience in could make you a stronger candidate.

If you are looking for residency positions then I think the thesis option would definitely make you a stronger candidate.

However, should you choose to not pursue the thesis option, I don't think it will be a deal breaker for employers in community hospital environments or free standing clinics or consulting groups. It might make you less interesting to potential employers in academic environments, though.
 
EricVT, thanks for the reply!

The thesis project would not be very clinically meaningful (Monte Carlo simulation of proton beam). I currently don't have any clinical experience however I will receive clinical training during the summer semester through our school's clinical rotation. I'll spend two full days a week learning with a physicist. I'll also spend two days a week in a lab class where I will be learning various therapy and imaging tasks.

I plan to apply to both residencies as well as junior physicist jobs. I'd probably take a residency if I was offered one, but would be happy with a junior physicist job too.
 
Last edited:
Since you've already done a thesis-based master's degree in a closely related field, doing another one is unlikely to bring much more to the table.

That said, many MSc-level medical physics graduates are finding that the job market is extremely competative right now and many are opting to continue on to the PhD to be more competative for a residency. It will likely be easier to get into a PhD program if you do the thesis-based option.

Another advantage of a thesis-based option is that it will likely lead to a medical physics related publication, which will add "value" to your CV - even for clinically-oriented positions.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top