Struggling with MTW Exercises: Any Hints for Exercise 3.18 and 5.1?

zn52
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
hello there,
I have started to tackle the giant book Gravitation by MTW on my own. I would like to see how you people who are having fun in reading this masterpiece faring in solving the exercises. I have read some books on tensor analysis and differential geometry and spacetime geometry as a preparation for MTW. I have also watched the stanford lectures on youtube and downloaded those by Kip Thorne...
Sometimes I spend days to just figure out how to solve one small step of an exercise. It is nice to see that there are no answers, that pushes people to really find out and think by themselves how to find an answer.
I have however not been able to find the answer to some questions. I have reached page 141 without having gone through chapter 4 which I will go back to at chapter 14.

Now my first question is regarding Exercise 3.18 point b) . Please DO NOT answer but provide some hints as to how to manage to get the derivative with respect to a third variable in order to get the last three terms in the equation 3.62 to be proven (the Maxwell's equation).

My second question is regarding exercise 5.1 on page 141. How come the tension and the pressure have the same value ? The field lines here are they the field lines of the electromagnetic force ?

Please note that I'm a graduate student in Physics specialized in Astrophysics (2007).
Thank you very much,
Cheers,
Ziad.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can replace the dummy indices in the first term in 3.61 in two ways.
 
thank you for your answer.
Yes I have tried to do that but to no avail. The problem is that the derivative in the first term is with respect to one index only (Nu). Would it be possible to have another derivative with respect to another index , i.e. alpha ?
In summary : how to extract from the first term two terms with derivatives with respect to different indices ? I have tried to exploit the symmetry property of the F in order to get the Half but to no avail either...
 
Nu and alpha are both dummy index in that term, so you can replace them both.
 
I thank you so much for your assistance. after several weeks deep into tensors I have now realized that these are dummy indices. It is not obvious for anyone at the beginning to spot that...Now I can sleep happily at night...
Cheers,
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top