Courses Multiple physics and maths courses at the same time?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around selecting electives for an undergraduate spring semester, with a focus on balancing math-heavy and concept-heavy courses. The proposed schedule includes a mix of courses in AC circuits analysis, probability and statistics, modern physics, discrete time signals, and thermodynamics. Concerns are raised about the potential difficulty of taking multiple challenging courses simultaneously, particularly with three exams scheduled within a week. While the student feels confident in their ability to manage the workload, they acknowledge the importance of maintaining good grades and being prepared for unforeseen circumstances. The option to delay the modern physics course to reduce the number of math-based courses is considered, but this could complicate the schedule in the final year. The discussion emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to course selection, with advice to avoid overloading and to prioritize well-being alongside academic responsibilities.
Bobman
Messages
15
Reaction score
6
So we are to choose electives (this is all undergrad) for the spring in about a month or so, and i am having doubts if i might end up taking one "math heavy" or "concept heavy" course too many.

My uni splits one semester into two periods, meaning the spring semester is based on two periods.

The would be schedule for period 1:
  • AC Circuits analysis course (fourier analysis, complex power, three phase power, kirchhoffs laws and norton-thevenin in circuits with inductors, capacitors etc)
  • A probability and statistics course (which is important for the thermodynamics and stat phys course)
  • First part of a "Modern physics" course (special relativity and quantum mechanics) No exam this period.
  • A course where we learn to write scientific papers (It doesn't take much time at all)
The would be schedule for period 2:
  • A discrete time signal course (a lot of differential equations, transforms and so on)
  • "Thermodynamics and statistical physics" (1rst and 2nd thermo laws, entropy, Carnots theorem, partition function, state density, Bose-Einstein, Fermi-Dirac and Maxwell-Boltzmann's distributions etc)
  • Last part of the "Modern physics" course (pretty much vibrations and rotations in molecules, atomic nucleus and radioactivity). This is also where the exam is.
  • The scientific papers course (again not very demanding at all)
When i asked the professors about the course two physics courses, the modern physics prof said the "worst" part will be in the first period and the thermodynamics prof says students usually find the course to be quite difficult. But at least the courses more difficult parts won't collide it seems. I am unable to ask any senior students on their opinions of the courses.

So what do i think about all this? The uni usually only schedule two math based courses at the same time, probably for a reason. Historically I've judged my study ability quite accurately, and i feel like this is doable, specially since i view the two physics courses as part of the "highlight" in my undergrad curriculum, thus being more motivated to study them. I generally regret not trying to do something more than trying and failing.

The one thing that "worries" me is taking three exams within a week. I usually follow the courses well, but i am not very proficient at studying for exams.

The alternative is to choose the modern physics course later, thus bringing it down to only two math based courses at the same time and this would obviously be very manageable. But it will cause a bit of a problem in my schedule during my last year of undergrad.

Writing all of this i realize i have pretty much decided where i stand in this question, i want to give it a shot. But i still appreciate any advice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would be conservative here and not overload yourself. One you want to keep your grades up and two sometimes things happen where you can't keep up the pace (catch the flu, family issue, friend needs help...) and three you're a student go do some friendly socializing but not too much. Take a walk and skip the alcohol, drugs and games that others often do.

At my school, I found that taking even one course would overwhelm me as I was also working 20+ hours per week, it was a trimester of normally 3 courses over 10 weeks. I found it best to take one math course and one physics course at a time.
 
  • Like
Likes Bobman
jedishrfu said:
I would be conservative here and not overload your self. One you want to keep your grades up and two sometimes things happen where you can't keep up the pace (catch the flu, family issue, friend needs help...) and three you're a student go do some friendly socializing but not too much. Take a walk and skip the alcohol, drugs and games that others often do.

At my school, I found that taking even one course would overwhelm me as I was also working 20+ hours per week, it was a trimester of normally 3 courses over 10 weeks. I found it best to take one math course and one physics course at a time.
One thing i didn't add, is that during november-january i will only have one math based course, "Continuous time signals and systems" along with two "easy" non-math based courses. This will hopefully give me time to prepare for this more "strenuous" semester.

I don't have to worry about work, i exercise a lot, i don't drink or do drugs and i do socialize a little occasionally :)
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
Back
Top