Multiplying Christoffel Symbols w/o Overloading Indices

  • Thread starter Thread starter space-time
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Indices
space-time
Messages
218
Reaction score
4
This expression:

\Gammaavc\Gammacab

Can someone please show me how to multiply the two Christoffel symbol formulas for these Christoffel symbols without overloading any indices?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would do this as two separate sums. If you sum over "a" first, you get \Gamma^a_{vc}\Gamma^d_{ab}= \Gamma^1_{vc}\Gamma^c_{1b}+ \Gamma^2_{vc}\Gamma^c_{2b}+ \Gamma^3_{vc}\Gamma^c_{ab}+ \Gamma^4_{vc}\Gamma^c_{4b}

Now, in each of those replace c with 1, 2, 3, and 4. There will be a sum of 16 such products. The first four are \Gamma^1_{vc}\Gamma^c_{1b}= \Gamma^1_{v1}\Gamma^2_{1b}+ \Gamma^1_{v2}\Gamma^2_{1b}+ \Gamma^1_{v3}\Gamma^3_{1b}+ \Gamma^1_{v4}\Gamma^4_{1b}.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top