Multipole moments using spherical harmonics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the application of spherical harmonics in solving Laplace's equation in spherical coordinates, specifically in the context of multipole moments. The terms "l" and "m" are defined, with "l" representing the multipole order (l = 0 for monopole, l = 1 for dipole) and "m" indicating the azimuthal dependence of the function. The conversation emphasizes the importance of these terms in describing arbitrary charge distributions and highlights the relationship between multipole fields and their radial dependencies, such as inverse square for monopoles and inverse cube for dipoles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace's equation in spherical coordinates
  • Familiarity with spherical harmonics and their mathematical properties
  • Basic knowledge of multipole expansion in electrostatics
  • Concept of quantum numbers in three-dimensional functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and properties of spherical harmonics
  • Learn about multipole expansions in electrostatics
  • Explore the application of spherical harmonics in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the relationship between multipole moments and charge distributions
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism and quantum mechanics, as well as researchers and educators looking to deepen their understanding of spherical harmonics and multipole moments.

poophead
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello,

My question is fairly simple. My instructor solved in class today Laplace's equation in spherical coordinates which resulted in spherical harmonics.

I have not taken any quantum mechanics yet so this is my first exposure to spherical harmonics. What do the "l" and "m" terms in the expressions correspond to exactly in physical reality?

I'm under the impression that l = 0--> monopole, l = 1 --> dipole, etc. But what are the "m" terms for? And how exactly do I use these crazy formulas to find the multipole moments for arbitrary charge distributions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're basically trying to find a basis set to describe functions in 3-dimensions. Recall back when you described a 2-D function with a simple Fourier transform. There was a single set of "quantum numbers" to represent those functions. In 3-D you have a principle quantum number (n <->corresponding to the radial part of your fields). L and m relate to the dependence of the function on polar angle and azimuthal angle.

Multipole fields refer to the component of the field varying as different powers of the radial coordinate (monopole <-> inverse square, dipole <-> inverse cube, quadrupole <-> inverse fourth power etc.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K