Multivariable calculus: Limits (2)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around limits in multivariable calculus, specifically focusing on proving limits without breaking vectors into components and evaluating limits involving continuity. The original poster presents two limit problems: one involving the limit of a fraction as (x,y) approaches (0,0) and another as (x,y,z) approaches (1,0,-1).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formal proof of limits, questioning how to establish inequalities without component breakdown. There is also exploration of continuity and the implications of approaching limits from different directions, particularly regarding the existence of limits when certain paths are not in the domain.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problems, raising questions about the validity of certain approaches and the definitions of continuity. Some suggest using polar coordinates for the first limit, while others express confusion about the continuity of the function in the second limit and the implications of approaching from various directions.

Contextual Notes

There are concerns regarding the domain of the functions involved, particularly in relation to the limits being evaluated. Participants highlight the necessity of ensuring that sequences used in limit evaluations remain within the defined domain.

kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0
Note: <= means less than or equal to, >= means greater than or equal to

1) Prove formally that
lim xy^2 / (x^2 + y^2) = 0
(x,y)->(0,0)
without breaking the vectors into components.


Let X=(x,y). We want to prove that for all epsilon>0, there exists a delta>0 such that if 0<||X-0||=sqrt(x^2 + y^2)<delta, then |xy^2 / (x^2 + y^2)|<epsilon

Starting with |xy^2 / (x^2 + y^2)| <= ? For here HOW can I find an appropriate inequality that can help me find a delta that works? Remember that here we are not allowed to break the vector into individual components.



2) Evaluate lim e^(x+z) / {z^2 + cos[sqrt(xy)]}.
(x,y,z)->(1,0,-1)

Solution:
We must have xy>=0
By continuity, the limit equals (direct substitution)
e^(1-1) / {(-1)^2 + cos[sqrt(0)]} = 1/2


I have no idea why they can use continuity/direct subtitution to eavluate the limit...
I believe that as (x,y,z) approaches (1,0,-1) from ALL direction, the limit must exist and equal , but in the case, say, I approach (1,0,-1) through the route (0.99, -0.01, -0.99) ->(0.999, -0.001, -0.999) is clearly impossible because xy=(0.999)(-0.011)<0 which means it is out of the domain. Then how can the limit still exist?
As far as I know, at least some neighbourhood of (1,0,-1) has to be defined for the possibility of a limit to exist...


I am still terribly confused no matter how many times I read the definitions and theorems from my textbook. Any help or explanation will be greatly appreciated!:smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1) How do you write out ||X-0||?
2) Why worry about a sequence that is not in the domain? The point is, the sequence you use must lie within the domain, and as long as it does, you have a limit (in this case).
 
1) ||X-0|| = sqrt (x^2 + y^2), but how does this help?


2) For example,
lim sqrt x doesn't exist since the left hand limit doesn't exist.
x->0
For the limit to exist, the left and right hand limits must exist and must be equal.

So similarly, in this case, the limit must exist as (x,y,z)->(1,0,-1) from every direction, but in some directions the limit clearly doesn't exist because the function isn't even defined. Having said these, I now don't understand why it's still possible for the limit to exist and equal to 1/2...
 
We want to prove that for all epsilon>0, there exists a delta>0 such that if ||(x, y)||<delta, then |xy^2 / (x^2 + y^2)|<epsilon
What about something like this:
since [itex]x^2 \le x^2 + y^2[/itex], certainly [itex]|x| \le \sqrt{x^2 + y^2} = ||(x, y)||[/itex] and similarly [itex]|y| \le ||(x, y)||[/itex].
Now
[tex]| x y^2 / (x^2 + y^2) | = |x| |y|^2 / ||x||^2[/tex].
Use the above inequalities to estimate |x| and |y| and (assuming that X is not 0, divide out some norms of X), and you will be done.
 
kingwinner said:
1) Prove formally that
lim xy^2 / (x^2 + y^2) = 0
(x,y)->(0,0)
without breaking the vectors into components.

Put
[tex]\frac{xy^2}{x^2+ y^2}[/tex]
into polar coordinates. That way, "(x,y) going to (0,0)" just means that r goes to 0 irrespective of [itex]\theta[/itex].

kingwinner said:
I have no idea why they can use continuity/direct subtitution to eavluate the limit...
The definition of "continuity" is "[itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x)= f(a)[/itex]"!

kingwinner said:
I believe that as (x,y,z) approaches (1,0,-1) from ALL direction, the limit must exist and equal , but in the case, say, I approach (1,0,-1) through the route (0.99, -0.01, -0.99) ->(0.999, -0.001, -0.999) is clearly impossible because xy=(0.999)(-0.011)<0 which means it is out of the domain. Then how can the limit still exist?
From ALL possible directions. From all directions in the domain.
 
HallsofIvy said:
444
From ALL possible directions. From all directions in the domain.


Are you sure about this?

For example,
lim sqrt x doesn't exist since the left hand limit doesn't exist.
x->0
For the limit to exist, the left and right hand limits must exist and must be equal. It is NOT just from all directions IN the domain...

So similarly, in this case, the limit must exist as (x,y,z)->(1,0,-1) from EVERY direction I believe, but in some directions the limit clearly doesn't exist because the function isn't even defined. Having said these, I now don't understand why it's still possible for the limit to exist and equal to 1/2...

Could someone please answer this conceptual problem? Thanks!
 
2) And also, how can I know that the funciton f(x,y,z) = e^(x+z) / {z^2 + cos[sqrt(xy)]} is continuous at (x,y,z)=(1,0,-1) for sure?
(I can't even find the domain of the function because when I set the denominator equal to 0, I am unable to solve for it... )
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K