Multivariable calculus mass density question

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the total mass of a wire shaped like a quarter circle with a specific mass density function. The initial approach involved converting the wire's coordinates to polar form and applying a double integral, which led to confusion about whether the wire should be treated as one-dimensional. Participants clarified that the wire is indeed a one-dimensional object, requiring a single integral along its path. The correct setup for the integral involves using the parameterization of the wire and adjusting the bounds for theta to account for the clockwise direction. Ultimately, the correct mass calculation should yield a different result than initially obtained, emphasizing the importance of accurate bounds in the integral.
jamesdocherty
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let the path C traverse part of the circle or radius 3 at the origin, in a clockwise direction, from (0,-3) to (3,0). Calculate the total mass of a wire in shape C, if the mass density of the wire is u=x^2+4y

Homework Equations


mass of plate equation= double integral u(x,y) dx dy

The Attempt at a Solution


I converted the wire into polar coordinates as its a circle, with x=3cos(theta) and y=3sin(theta) and as it travels from -pi/2 to 2pi, 0<r<3 and -pi/2<theta<2pi, after doing that i subbed x=3cos(theta) and y=3sin(theta) into the mass density equation (u) to obtain u=9cos^2(theta) + 12sin(theta) and as the mass of plate equation is double integral u(x,y) dx dy I subbed the vaules into this equation but with respect to polar coordinates to get:

double integral 9cos^2(theta) + 12sin(theta) dtheta dr with 0<r<3 and -pi/2<theta<2pi

solving this ended up getting 135*pi/4 -36 to be the answer, but I'm a little confused as i think i worked out the mass for 3/4 of the circle, instead of the wire and am now thinking i might need to work out a ratio for area of circumference/total area of circle and multiply by this ratio to get the right answer.

Any Help would be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jamesdocherty said:

Homework Statement


Let the path C traverse part of the circle or radius 3 at the origin, in a clockwise direction, from (0,-3) to (3,0). Calculate the total mass of a wire in shape C, if the mass density of the wire is u=x^2+4y

Homework Equations


mass of plate equation= double integral u(x,y) dx dy

The Attempt at a Solution


I converted the wire into polar coordinates as its a circle, with x=3cos(theta) and y=3sin(theta) and as it travels from -pi/2 to 2pi, 0<r<3 and -pi/2<theta<2pi, after doing that i subbed x=3cos(theta) and y=3sin(theta) into the mass density equation (u) to obtain u=9cos^2(theta) + 12sin(theta) and as the mass of plate equation is double integral u(x,y) dx dy I subbed the vaules into this equation but with respect to polar coordinates to get:

double integral 9cos^2(theta) + 12sin(theta) dtheta dr with 0<r<3 and -pi/2<theta<2pi

solving this ended up getting 135*pi/4 -36 to be the answer, but I'm a little confused as i think i worked out the mass for 3/4 of the circle, instead of the wire and am now thinking i might need to work out a ratio for area of circumference/total area of circle and multiply by this ratio to get the right answer.

Any Help would be much appreciated!

Why are you doing a dxdy integral? Isn't a wire a one-dimensional object?
 
i'm not sure to be honest i thought it would be a two-dimensional object as it would have both a x and y direction but i am probably wrong, if it is a one dimensional object, how would i go about solving this problem?, would it just be x=3cost and y=3sint where -pi/2<t<2pi and hence you would get the integral: 9cos^2(theta) + 12sin(theta) dt where -pi/2<t<2pi and solving this would get you 45pi/4 -12, thanks for the fast reply :)
 
Ray Vickson said:
Why are you doing a dxdy integral? Isn't a wire a one-dimensional object?
I haven't done any work on the problem, but the density is given as a function of x and y, and the wire follows a curved path (a quarter circle), so an iterated integral seems reasonable to me.
 
jamesdocherty said:
i'm not sure to be honest i thought it would be a two-dimensional object as it would have both a x and y direction but i am probably wrong, if it is a one dimensional object, how would i go about solving this problem?, would it just be x=3cost and y=3sint where -pi/2<t<2pi and hence you would get the integral: 9cos^2(theta) + 12sin(theta) dt where -pi/2<t<2pi and solving this would get you 45pi/4 -12, thanks for the fast reply :)

My interpretation is that the wire is "infinitely thin", so is just a curved line in 2 dimensions. For that reason you need two coordinates ##(x,y)## to specify a point on the wire. The "density" ##\rho(x,y)## would then be the mass per unit length at the point ##(x,y)##; that is, the mass ##\Delta m## of a little bit of wire of length ##\Delta s## located at ##(x,y)## would be ##\Delta m = \rho(x,y) \Delta s##. But that is just my interpretation.
 
Ray Vickson said:
My interpretation is that the wire is "infinitely thin", so is just a curved line in 2 dimensions. For that reason you need two coordinates ##(x,y)## to specify a point on the wire. The "density" ##\rho(x,y)## would then be the mass per unit length at the point ##(x,y)##; that is, the mass ##\Delta m## of a little bit of wire of length ##\Delta s## located at ##(x,y)## would be ##\Delta m = \rho(x,y) \Delta s##. But that is just my interpretation.

That would also be my interpretation. Otherwise I would have expected the problem to ask for the mass of a "plate" and for the boundary of the plate to be a closed curve.
 
yeah that makes sense, thanks for that, because of that i would only need to integrate once then and hence got x=3cost and y=3sint where -pi/2<t<2pi and then the integral: 9cos^2(theta) + 12sin(theta) dt where -pi/2<t<2pi and solving this would get you 45pi/4 -12, would this be correct or would i need to do something else?
 
And, just in case anyone is still confused about 1 dimensional or 2 dimensional object, remember that even though the wire exists in 3 dimensions, it only takes one parameter to locate a point on it. That's why you use ##\vec r(t)=\langle x(t),y(t),z(t)\rangle## to describe it. Same for a surface. It exists in 3 dimensional space but you only need two parameters to describe it, so you use ##\vec r(u,v)##.
 
jamesdocherty said:
yeah that makes sense, thanks for that, because of that i would only need to integrate once then and hence got x=3cost and y=3sint where -pi/2<t<2pi and then the integral: 9cos^2(theta) + 12sin(theta) dt where -pi/2<t<2pi and solving this would get you 45pi/4 -12, would this be correct or would i need to do something else?

It looks wrong. You should show your work in detail, because I cannot figure out how you got your answer.
 
  • #10
jamesdocherty said:
would it just be x=3cost and y=3sint where -pi/2<t<2pi and hence you would get the integral: 9cos^2(theta) + 12sin(theta) dt where -pi/2<t<2pi and solving this would get you 45pi/4 -12, thanks for the fast reply :)

It looks like that would be the right integral, but the bounds for theta might be incorrect. From your initial problem, you wrote "Clockwise," which would indicate a negative change in theta, from 3*pi/2 to 0.
 
  • #11
The integral is not quite correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K