Multivariable calculus. The chain rule.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the chain rule in multivariable calculus, specifically in the context of evaluating partial derivatives of a function defined as z = x^2 y sin(u) tan(v). Participants are tasked with finding the value of ∂z/∂u + ln(∂z/∂v) at specific values of u and v, given certain conditions for x and y as functions of u and v.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of the problem, questioning the correct expression of the function z and the associated partial derivatives. There are attempts to clarify the expressions used in the calculations and to identify potential errors in the original poster's approach.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on evaluating the partial derivatives and have pointed out missing terms in the calculations. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of these corrections, and participants are encouraged to re-evaluate their calculations based on the feedback received.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of ensuring that trigonometric functions are evaluated correctly, particularly in relation to the variables involved. There is also mention of the need for careful consideration of the signs and values when applying logarithmic functions.

letalea
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let x=x^2ysin(u)tan(v), where x(u,v) and y(u,v) are smooth functions that, when evaluated at u=1 and v=-3 satisfy

x=2.112, y=4.797, [tex]\partial[/tex]x/[tex]\partial[/tex]u = -3.491, [tex]\partial[/tex]x/[tex]\partial[/tex]v = -2.230 , [tex]\partial[/tex]y/[tex]\partial[/tex]u = 1.787 , [tex]\partial[/tex]y/[tex]\partial[/tex]v = 1.554.

Then the value of [tex]\partial[/tex]z/[tex]\partial[/tex]u + ln ( [tex]\partial[/tex]z/[tex]\partial[/tex]v), at u =1, v= -3 is one of the following:

9.004
-1.225
-3.257
3.896
6.469
-2.368
-9.311
-3.658


The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\partial[/tex]z/[tex]\partial[/tex]u= (2(2.112)(4.797)sin(1)tan(-3))(-3.491) + (2.112^2 sin(1)tan(2.112))(1.787) = 0.057407948

[tex]\partial[/tex]z/[tex]\partial[/tex]v=(2(2.112)(4.797)sin(1)tan(-3))(-2.230) + (2.112^2 sin(1)tan(-3))(1.554) = 0.034988483

0.057407948 + ln(0.034988483) = -3.295


The answer, which you can tell, is not even a solution on the list of possible answers. Any insight to where I went wrong would be appreciated! Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think that you write some formulas wrong (you have mistake in writing) .
 
letalea said:

Homework Statement



Let x=x^2ysin(u)tan(v)
This would make more sense as z = x2y sin(u) tan(v).
letalea said:
, where x(u,v) and y(u,v) are smooth functions that, when evaluated at u=1 and v=-3 satisfy

x=2.112, y=4.797, [tex]\partial[/tex]x/[tex]\partial[/tex]u = -3.491, [tex]\partial[/tex]x/[tex]\partial[/tex]v = -2.230 , [tex]\partial[/tex]y/[tex]\partial[/tex]u = 1.787 , [tex]\partial[/tex]y/[tex]\partial[/tex]v = 1.554.

Then the value of [tex]\partial[/tex]z/[tex]\partial[/tex]u + ln ( [tex]\partial[/tex]z/[tex]\partial[/tex]v), at u =1, v= -3 is one of the following:

9.004
-1.225
-3.257
3.896
6.469
-2.368
-9.311
-3.658


The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\partial[/tex]z/[tex]\partial[/tex]u= (2(2.112)(4.797)sin(1)tan(-3))(-3.491) + (2.112^2 sin(1)tan(2.112))(1.787) = 0.057407948

[tex]\partial[/tex]z/[tex]\partial[/tex]v=(2(2.112)(4.797)sin(1)tan(-3))(-2.230) + (2.112^2 sin(1)tan(-3))(1.554) = 0.034988483

0.057407948 + ln(0.034988483) = -3.295


The answer, which you can tell, is not even a solution on the list of possible answers. Any insight to where I went wrong would be appreciated! Thanks in advance!
 
Yes sorry, it was a posting mistake, the question was z=x^2ysin(u)tan(v). Can you see any errors in how I solved the partial derivatives, as I have tried multiple times and can not seem to find the correct solution.
 
So you have z = x2(u, v) y(u, v) sin(u) tan(v).

Before putting in all the numbers, what do you get for zu and zv?

zu is just another way of writing [tex]\frac{\partial z}{\partial u}[/tex]
 
Okay I hope this is what you were wanting me to answer...

[tex]\partial[/tex]z/[tex]\partial[/tex]u = ([tex]\partial[/tex]z/[tex]\partial[/tex]x) ([tex]\partial[/tex]x/[tex]\partial[/tex]u) + ([tex]\partial[/tex]z/[tex]\partial[/tex]y)([tex]\partial[/tex]y/[tex]\partial[/tex]u)

=(2xysin(u)tan(v))([tex]\partial[/tex]x/[tex]\partial[/tex]u) +(x^2sin(u)tan(v))([tex]\partial[/tex]y/[tex]\partial[/tex]u)

[tex]\partial[/tex]z/[tex]\partial[/tex]v= ([tex]\partial[/tex]z/[tex]\partial[/tex]x) ([tex]\partial[/tex]x/[tex]\partial[/tex]v) + ([tex]\partial[/tex]z/[tex]\partial[/tex]y)([tex]\partial[/tex]y/[tex]\partial[/tex]v)

=(2xysin(u)tan(v))([tex]\partial[/tex]x/[tex]\partial[/tex]v) + (x^2sin(u)tan(v))([tex]\partial[/tex]y/[tex]\partial[/tex]v)
 
That looks OK. It will be easier to evaluate all the functions and partials using subscript notation.

So zu = 2xysin(u)tan(v) xu + x2sin(u)tan(v) yu

and zv = 2xysin(u)tan(v) xv + x2sin(u)tan(v) yv


You have x(1, -3) = 2.112, y(1, -3) = 4.7997
xu(1, -3) = -3.491
xv(1, -3) = -2.230
yu(1, -3) = 1.787
yv(1, -3) = 1.554

You need to evaluate zu(1, -3) + ln(zv(1, -3))

Plug the function/partial derivative values in. Make sure your calculator is in radian mode when you evaluate sin(1) and tan(-3).
 
Last edited:
Thank you I will give that a try!
 
I am working on this question as well. Though, upon evaluating ln(Zv) I came out with a negative number, and ln of a negative is not valid. What did I do wrong?
ln(2(2.112)(4.797)sin(1)tan(-3)(-2.230) + ((2.112^2)sin(1)tan(-3)(1.554))) = Zv

I'm certain the partail derivative is correct, I've gone over it and tried to manipulate different ways, but still not the right answer.
 
  • #10
I didn't check letalea's work closely back in post #7, and the partial derivatives shown there are missing a term in each of them.

Assuming z = x2y * sin(u) * tan(v), where x = x(u, v) and y = y(u, v) as described earlier, then

zu = 2x * xu * y * sin(u) * tan(v) + x2 *yu * sin(u) * tan(v) + x2 * y * cos(u) * tan(v)

In letalea's work, that last term is missing.

Also,
zv = 2x * xv * y * sin(u) * tan(v) + x2 *yv * sin(u) * tan(v) + x2 * y * sin(u) * sec2(v)

The last term is missing in this partial, as well.

For a sanity check, evaluate zv at (1, -3) to see if it comes up positive this time (so you can take its log).
 
  • #11
Thank you, that was very helpful! I was wondering if I needed to evaluate the trig function in relation to u! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K