B Muons, Positrons & IR Energy: A Muon Q&A

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter kodybatill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Muons
kodybatill
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If a Chlorine Positron - Lithium Positron - and Argon Positron - all left the same unit of infrared energy at once - would the equivalent of a Muon(s) be taken by the interaction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kodybatill said:
If a Chlorine Positron - Lithium Positron - and Argon Positron - all left the same unit of infrared energy at once
What do you mean by that? There is no such thing as a "Chlorine Positron" (and similar for the others), "infrared energy" is not a thing on its own, and what leaves what is unclear.
kodybatill said:
would the equivalent of a Muon(s) be taken by the interaction?
There is no "equivalent of a muon".
 
mfb said:
What do you mean by that? There is no such thing as a "Chlorine Positron" (and similar for the others), "infrared energy" is not a thing on its own, and what leaves what is unclear.There is no "equivalent of a muon".

Well for instance - different isotopes can experience positron emission - for example as described here: "Isotopes on the lower side of the band tend to undergo positron emission." - http://web.fscj.edu/Milczanowski/psc/lect/CH7/isotopes.htm

It is in reference to Chlorine Isotopes I believe.

So do different positrons display different abilities or information depending on the atom they are emitted from?
 
kodybatill said:
Well for instance - different isotopes can experience positron emission - for example as described here: "Isotopes on the lower side of the band tend to undergo positron emission." - http://web.fscj.edu/Milczanowski/psc/lect/CH7/isotopes.htm
Yes, that is a possible mode of radioactive decay for some isotopes.
kodybatill said:
So do different positrons display different abilities or information depending on the atom they are emitted from?
No, all positrons are exactly the same type of particle.
They will have a different energy distribution depending on the energy released in the decay (which depends on the isotope).

All this has nothing to do with muons.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top