Music Music by Mozart, believed lost, discovered

  • Thread starter Thread starter DennisN
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classical Music
AI Thread Summary
A previously lost string trio composition by Mozart, believed to have been written in his teenage years, has been discovered in a German library during an archival cataloging project. This significant find adds to the understanding of Mozart's early work and creative development. The piece was performed in Salzburg on September 19, 2024, showcasing its historical importance and musical value. The discovery highlights ongoing efforts to uncover and preserve classical music heritage.
DennisN
Gold Member
Messages
2,168
Reaction score
9,727
Mozart String Composition, Believed Lost, Discovered in Germany (Pitchfork)

"The string trio, probably written in the composer’s teens, was found in a library as archivists compiled an updated catalog of his work"

Article: https://pitchfork.com/news/mozart-string-composition-believed-lost-discovered-in-germany/

And here is the piece on youtube, performed in Salzburg 19 September 2024:

W. A. Mozart - "Ganz kleine Nachtmusik" KV 648 - Previously unknown piece - Salzburg - 19 Sept 2024
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970 and Hornbein
Science news on Phys.org
"What is that racket! You call that music? It's just noise!" - Mozart's dad.
 
  • Haha
Likes phinds and DennisN
There is a neighboring thread Cover songs versus the original track, which ones are better? https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/cover-songs-versus-the-original-track-which-ones-are-better.1050205/ which is an endless subject and as colorful are the posts there. I came across a Buddy Holly cover by Eva Cassidy only to find out that the Buddy Holly song was already a Paul Anka cover. Anyway, both artists who had covered the song have passed far too early in their lives. That gave me the...
The piece came-up from the "Lame Jokes" section of the forum. Someobody carried a step from one of the posts and I became curious and tried a brief web search. A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p). Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?" https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/
Back
Top