Mutli-partite states and operators

  • Thread starter Thread starter MaverickMenzies
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators States
MaverickMenzies
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
Hi, I've seen the following in quantum info textbooks and papers and I was just wondering if anyone knows if it has any phsical interpretation or significance?

The space of operators that act on a HIlbert space is isomorphic to the tensor product of the original Hilbert space with its dual:

H otimes H* ~ L(H)

This means that if we start with a tensor product Hilbert space then it is possible to regard the states in this space as operators acting on another space. I.e. there is a one-to-one relationship between the vectors of this tensor product space and operators acting on a separate space.

Ok, the axioms of QM require that the tensor product be used when the system has more than one degree of freedom. Does this then mean that perhaps composite quantum systems in certain states can be imagined as acting as observables on other quantum systems?

What do you guys think? Am I reading too much into it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're reading too much into it. Operators are uniquely defined by their matrix representation in a basis - which looks like

\begin{align*}\hat{A} &amp;= \sum_{a} \sum_{a&#039;} | a \rangle \langle a | \hat{A} | a&#039; \rangle \langle a&#039; | \\<br /> &amp;= \sum_{a} \sum_{a&#039;} \left( \langle a | \hat{A} | a&#039; \rangle \right) | a \rangle \langle a&#039; | \end{align}

with matrix elements \left( \langle a | \hat{A} | a&#039; \rangle \right). So an arbitary operator is a linear combination of operators of the form | a \rangle \langle a&#039; | - i.e. tensor products of basis vectors and dual basis vectors - which themselves form a basis for the space of operators.

To check your intuition, note that in finite spaces, the dimension of the space of NxN matrices (operators) is N^2, the square of the dimension N of the vector (Hilbert) space.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top