Muzzle Velocity of Spring Loaded Musket Ball: 64.26m/s

  • Thread starter Thread starter howdybilly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the potential muzzle velocity of a musket ball using a compressed spring instead of gunpowder. Initial calculations suggest a muzzle velocity of 64.26 m/s, which is significantly lower than the expected 310 m/s of a traditional musket. Participants recommend working backwards from the known exit velocity to determine the necessary spring constant, leading to a revised spring constant of 2979 Nm with adjusted coil specifications. Concerns are raised about the feasibility of achieving such a high spring constant with the given dimensions. Overall, the calculations highlight the challenges in replicating the performance of traditional firearms using mechanical springs.
howdybilly
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
disclaimer: bizarre question from physics novice

Using a smooth bore classic musket (approximately 1m length of barrel, musket ball (.0173m diameter)), what would the potential muzzle velocity of the musket ball be if the powder charge were replaced with a compressed spring?

PE=1/2kx^2

KE=1/2mv^2

Using a spring with k=128 Nm (used a calculator on engineer's edge where modulus of ridgity G was 25x10^6, wire diameter d was .2 inches, mean coil diameter D was .48 inches and number of active coils n was 40). Not sure if this is kosher or not.

Assuming friction and gravity are negligible - the musketeer keeps the weapon well lubed and is on the moon, if he pulls the trigger which releases the "charged" spring, what will the muzzle velocity be of the musket ball when it leaves the musket? Let's also assume that the spring when uncompressed, is the full length (1m) of the barrel.

PE=1/2*128*1^2=64 joules?
KE=64=1/2*.031v^2 so v=64.26m/s

64.26m/s, long way from a 1700's .69 caliber musket firing around 310m/s

Could that be right? What am I messing up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
howdybilly said:
64.26m/s, long way from a 1700's .69 caliber musket firing around 310m/s

Could that be right? What am I messing up?

Given you know the exit velocity of the rifle, you may want to work it backwards - get the KE, stick it into the PE equation and see what spring you would need.

Then you can see if the required spring matches what you've got now.
 
jarednjames said:
Given you know the exit velocity of the rifle, you may want to work it backwards - get the KE, stick it into the PE equation and see what spring you would need.

Then you can see if the required spring matches what you've got now.

I did it backwards and entered the new spring constant k as 2979.1 Nm, plugged it into the spring calculator on the engineering website and keeping the diameters and modulus of ridgidity the same, I came up with a change in the number of active coils from 40 to 5.82.

I think there are probably some nature of elasticity issues that I'm neglecting but not sure.

so, rewritten - given a 1m long musket, standard .69 cal musket ball (approx .031kg) and a spring under compression with a constant of 1489 Nm (modulus of ridgitity 25x10^6psi, .25in wire diameter, .43 mean diameter and 5.82 active coils), a muzzle velocity of the musket ball could match the 310 m/s of a traditional powder musket.

PE=1/2*2979*1^2=1489.5 joules
KE=1489.5=1/2*.031v^2 so v=310 m/s

?? not sure if I'm using the right calculations. is a spring constant of 2979 Nm possible?

thanks
 
howdybilly said:
?? not sure if I'm using the right calculations. is a spring constant of 2979 Nm possible?

Not sure, but I'd say definitely not with the dimensions you're talking about.
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top