MHB My First Algebra Question: Associative Property

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Associative Property of addition, clarifying that the expression 3 + (8 + x) involves addition, not multiplication. The confusion arises from incorrectly applying multiplication to the terms within the parentheses. It is emphasized that the Associative Property allows for the reordering of addition without changing the outcome, such as in the example 4 + (7 + 2). The key takeaway is that addition does not require multiplication of the outer term with the contents of the parentheses. Understanding this distinction is crucial for correctly applying algebraic principles.
Duckfan
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I am reading through a introductory algebra textbook and refreshing memory on this topic. In the matter of the Associative Properties, it is giving me the expression 3 + (8+x).

(I'm skipping the graphs section because I'm leaving that for my tutor Saturday. But I'm moving to algebra because I think I can refresh memory fairly quickly).

Now this is addition in this part of the book. However, I'm just a bit confused because I do remember some of my algebra where in this expression I would multiply 3 into 8 since it's part of (forgot the term) process to solve this equation which (in my memory) multiply 3 & 8 to get 24x. Anytime I deal with an expression (for example) 4 + (7x+10) would work out to 28x +10. Because it's in the ( ) I'm required to multiply the expression inside the ( ).

And it also states I need to change the order: 3 + (x +8). Not understanding this aspect.

Am I correct on this question or do I need to clarify more?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: My FIrst Algebra Question

Duckfan said:
I am reading through a introductory algebra textbook and refreshing memory on this topic. In the matter of the Associative Properties, it is giving me the expression 3 + (8+x).

(I'm skipping the graphs section because I'm leaving that for my tutor Saturday. But I'm moving to algebra because I think I can refresh memory fairly quickly).

Now this is addition in this part of the book. However, I'm just a bit confused because I do remember some of my algebra where in this expression I would multiply 3 into 8 since it's part of (forgot the term) process to solve this equation which (in my memory) multiply 3 & 8 to get 24x. Anytime I deal with an expression (for example) 4 + (7x+10) would work out to 28x +10. Because it's in the ( ) I'm required to multiply the expression inside the ( ).

And it also states I need to change the order: 3 + (x +8). Not understanding this aspect.

Am I correct on this question or do I need to clarify more?

No you are missing the fact that the 3 is added to and not multiplied against the result of the bracket. The only way you'd multiply the three (3) from your first example or the four (4) from your second against the brackets is if the addition was replaced by a multiplication sign (*) or not present.

i.e. $$3 + ( x + 8) \ne 3 * (x + 8) $$ and $$4 + (7x + 10) \ne 4 * (7x + 10)$$

Associative property of math means that the order in which the operations are done is not relevant. Addition is associative since the order you add numbers together does not affect the result. For example if you have 4 + 7 + 2 it doesn't matter if I force the addition to be (4 + 7) + 2 or 4 + (7 + 2) the result will be the same.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top