My Leaking Skylight Peculiarity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Puma24
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A newly installed skylight is leaking water, with drops occasionally landing in a small glass placed underneath. The skylight's convex shape causes water to travel down its surface, but some drops detach prematurely yet still land in the glass. This phenomenon may be due to the horizontal momentum of the drops, allowing them to travel a distance through the air equal to their movement on the surface. The discussion also touches on the idea that drops moving along a wetted path may detach differently than those on a dry path. Overall, the situation raises questions about the physical properties of water on curved surfaces and the skylight's design.
Puma24
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

I woke up this morning to find my newly installed skylight was leaking water through it; only one drop at a time thankfully.

I placed a glass underneath it to catch the water, of quite a small diameter in comparison to the skylight (about a third the size), and then sat up, looking at the water running down it, when I noticed something weird.

The skylight is shaped like a convex curve (whether spherical or parabolic, I don't know) so the water thus far, travels from the edge, down to the lowest point on the outisde of the light, then drops off. This is where I lined up my glass to catch the water.

However, I kept watching it and found that sometimes the water didn't make it quite the way down to the lowest point, and dropped off prematurely. The weird thing was, was that every time it did this, it still landed in the glass.

So, it appears at the moment, that if the water falls of prematurely, the momentum it has carrying it towards the centre is sufficient to make it travel a distance through the air, equal to the distance that it would have moved on the surface of the skylight.

Is this a sort of physical property of an object moving along a curved surface, that my roof is of perfect dimensions for, or am I just seeing a lot of freaky coincidence.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Puma24 said:
So, it appears at the moment, that if the water falls of prematurely, the momentum it has carrying it towards the centre is sufficient to make it travel a distance through the air, equal to the distance that it would have moved on the surface of the skylight.
I think that's the correct explanation. At the time of release, the drop has some horizontal momentum that is (mostly) maintained and thus the drop travels some horizontal distance before dropping into the glass. As to why some drops detach themselves and others do not, my guess is that at some point along the path the drops that detach themselves are moving too fast and the cohesive force that keeps them on the glass cannot provide the needed centripetal acceleration. Drops that follow a path that is already wetted will move faster that drops following a drier path.
 
Puma24 said:
However, I kept watching it and found that sometimes the water didn't make it quite the way down to the lowest point, and dropped off prematurely. The weird thing was, was that every time it did this, it still landed in the glass
Are you saying that the drops still landed in glass and always in the centre of the glass?
At one third the size - diameter I presume - that could be a large enough target to not miss, and not a bulls eye every time.
 
Puma24 said:
Is this a sort of physical property of an object moving along a curved surface, that my roof is of perfect dimensions for, ...
They couldn't make it watertight, so at least they optimized the shape to minimize the size of the bucket needed.
 
  • Haha
Likes kuruman
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top