My Physics teacher presented a wrong diagram? (Explanation↓)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the misinterpretation of the formula a = g x sinθ in relation to a diagram presented by a physics teacher during a lab experiment involving an inclined plane. Participants clarified that the diagram does not accurately represent the vectors involved, as the lengths of the triangle's sides do not correspond to the magnitudes of the vectors. The correct interpretation involves understanding that the component of gravitational acceleration along the slope is g sin(θ), and the diagram should have been drawn to reflect this accurately. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly visualizing vector components in physics problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly forces and acceleration.
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions, specifically sine and cosine.
  • Knowledge of vector representation in physics.
  • Experience with inclined plane experiments and motion sensors.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the formula a = g sin(θ) in the context of inclined planes.
  • Learn about vector decomposition and how to represent vectors graphically.
  • Explore the role of angles in determining forces on inclined planes using simulation tools.
  • Review common misconceptions in physics diagrams and how to avoid them in problem-solving.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone involved in experimental physics who seeks to improve their understanding of vector analysis and diagram interpretation.

mioei
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
My Physics teacher told us to use a = g x sinθ during a lab trying to find how close we could calculate gravity using an inclined plane, a moving cart and a motion sensor to measure acceleration. He also drew a diagram next to the formula. I just wanted to confirm that his diagram was wrong, or whether i was looking at it incorrectly.https://gyazo.com/81845ac6ad3da72caf84e5a8d0501c83

After looking at the diagram i noticed there was no possible way a = g x sinθ could happen from that diagram. Sin = Opposite / Hypotenuse, meaning it would be g = a x sinθ. I looked up what the correct formula was and a = g x sinθ appeared. This means his diagram must be wrong or there must be something here i couldn't see. Could some one send me a correct diagram or tell me why i am wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, if the sides of the triangles are accelerations, the diagram is not right. The tangential acceleration (a) is less than g.
 
Last edited:
I think you are mis-interpreting the diagram. The sides of the triangle do not represent the vectors and their length is not proportional to the magnitude of the vectors.
It simply shows the slope down which your cart is rolling.
The direction of the sides shows the directions of a and g, but the lengths of the sides do not show their magnitude.

If you consider various angles for theta, you can see that the formula is reasonable.
When theta is 0, g causes no horizontal acceleration.
When theta is 90deg, the slope is vertical and a = g.
In vector terms, the component of g along the slope is g cos(90 - θ) = g sin(θ)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
mioei said:
My Physics teacher told us to use a = g x sinθ during a lab trying to find how close we could calculate gravity using an inclined plane, a moving cart and a motion sensor to measure acceleration. He also drew a diagram next to the formula. I just wanted to confirm that his diagram was wrong, or whether i was looking at it incorrectly.https://gyazo.com/81845ac6ad3da72caf84e5a8d0501c83

After looking at the diagram i noticed there was no possible way a = g x sinθ could happen from that diagram. Sin = Opposite / Hypotenuse, meaning it would be g = a x sinθ. I looked up what the correct formula was and a = g x sinθ appeared. This means his diagram must be wrong or there must be something here i couldn't see. Could some one send me a correct diagram or tell me why i am wrong?
His diagram is guaranteed to confuse you, and he should have realized this. Drop a normal from the lower end of g to the hypotenuse. This will produce a new triangle. The side of this new triangle parallel to the hypotenuse will be the component of g along the hypotenuse, and will be your acceleration component.

Chet
 
Merlin3189 said:
The sides of the triangle do not represent the vectors and their length is not proportional to the magnitude of the vectors.
It happens all the time and students need to be really disciplined to choose the correct triangle for vector calculations. The teacher should have either have drawn out the vector diagram over the physical picture or warned the students that they needed to do so.
I always recommend to check you've got it right by asking yourself if the force is increasing or decreasing with the angle that's shown (by eye). In a case like this one, g is clearly the maximum available and the acceleration a would be zero if the plane were horizontal. Hence, we're talking in terms of gsine(θ). In other examples, where an angle is drawn in a different place, it can be Cos(θ) that emerges from the sums.
@mioei: it was a good idea to bring the problem to PF and you presented the question well, rather than just saying "whats the answer?" Keep in touch!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Merlin3189 and Chestermiller

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
608
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
66K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K