My Physics teacher presented a wrong diagram? (Explanation↓)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of a diagram presented by a physics teacher in relation to the formula a = g x sinθ, used during a lab involving an inclined plane and motion sensor. Participants are examining whether the diagram accurately represents the relationship between acceleration and gravitational force in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the diagram is incorrect if the sides of the triangles represent accelerations, as tangential acceleration (a) should be less than g.
  • Another participant suggests that the diagram may be misinterpreted, indicating that the sides do not represent vector magnitudes but rather the slope of the incline.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that the direction of the sides indicates the directions of a and g, but their lengths do not reflect their magnitudes, proposing that the formula can be reasonable under certain conditions.
  • One participant critiques the teacher's diagram, suggesting that it is confusing and should have been accompanied by a clearer representation of the vector components involved.
  • Another participant notes the importance of correctly identifying the triangle for vector calculations and emphasizes the need for discipline in interpreting such diagrams.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing interpretations of the diagram and the formula, with no consensus reached on whether the diagram is correct or how it should be understood in relation to the formula a = g x sinθ.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the representation of vectors in the diagram and the conditions under which the formula applies. The discussion highlights the potential for confusion in visual representations of physical concepts.

mioei
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
My Physics teacher told us to use a = g x sinθ during a lab trying to find how close we could calculate gravity using an inclined plane, a moving cart and a motion sensor to measure acceleration. He also drew a diagram next to the formula. I just wanted to confirm that his diagram was wrong, or whether i was looking at it incorrectly.https://gyazo.com/81845ac6ad3da72caf84e5a8d0501c83

After looking at the diagram i noticed there was no possible way a = g x sinθ could happen from that diagram. Sin = Opposite / Hypotenuse, meaning it would be g = a x sinθ. I looked up what the correct formula was and a = g x sinθ appeared. This means his diagram must be wrong or there must be something here i couldn't see. Could some one send me a correct diagram or tell me why i am wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, if the sides of the triangles are accelerations, the diagram is not right. The tangential acceleration (a) is less than g.
 
Last edited:
I think you are mis-interpreting the diagram. The sides of the triangle do not represent the vectors and their length is not proportional to the magnitude of the vectors.
It simply shows the slope down which your cart is rolling.
The direction of the sides shows the directions of a and g, but the lengths of the sides do not show their magnitude.

If you consider various angles for theta, you can see that the formula is reasonable.
When theta is 0, g causes no horizontal acceleration.
When theta is 90deg, the slope is vertical and a = g.
In vector terms, the component of g along the slope is g cos(90 - θ) = g sin(θ)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
mioei said:
My Physics teacher told us to use a = g x sinθ during a lab trying to find how close we could calculate gravity using an inclined plane, a moving cart and a motion sensor to measure acceleration. He also drew a diagram next to the formula. I just wanted to confirm that his diagram was wrong, or whether i was looking at it incorrectly.https://gyazo.com/81845ac6ad3da72caf84e5a8d0501c83

After looking at the diagram i noticed there was no possible way a = g x sinθ could happen from that diagram. Sin = Opposite / Hypotenuse, meaning it would be g = a x sinθ. I looked up what the correct formula was and a = g x sinθ appeared. This means his diagram must be wrong or there must be something here i couldn't see. Could some one send me a correct diagram or tell me why i am wrong?
His diagram is guaranteed to confuse you, and he should have realized this. Drop a normal from the lower end of g to the hypotenuse. This will produce a new triangle. The side of this new triangle parallel to the hypotenuse will be the component of g along the hypotenuse, and will be your acceleration component.

Chet
 
Merlin3189 said:
The sides of the triangle do not represent the vectors and their length is not proportional to the magnitude of the vectors.
It happens all the time and students need to be really disciplined to choose the correct triangle for vector calculations. The teacher should have either have drawn out the vector diagram over the physical picture or warned the students that they needed to do so.
I always recommend to check you've got it right by asking yourself if the force is increasing or decreasing with the angle that's shown (by eye). In a case like this one, g is clearly the maximum available and the acceleration a would be zero if the plane were horizontal. Hence, we're talking in terms of gsine(θ). In other examples, where an angle is drawn in a different place, it can be Cos(θ) that emerges from the sums.
@mioei: it was a good idea to bring the problem to PF and you presented the question well, rather than just saying "whats the answer?" Keep in touch!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Merlin3189 and Chestermiller

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
965
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
67K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K