My problem: weight distribution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges faced by two individuals trying to lift a 600-pound box with different dimensions. They struggle with the 3'x3' box but manage to move the 1'x5' box, raising questions about weight distribution and ease of handling. Factors such as the boxes' dimensions, density, and the lifting technique are considered crucial to understanding the difference in their ability to move the boxes. The conversation suggests that the narrower base of the second box may contribute to its ease of movement. Overall, the complexity of lifting and moving heavy objects involves multiple physical principles beyond just weight distribution.
skeonamm
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
My problem:

2 people attempt to lift a 600lbs square box that is 3'x3'. They are not able to.
The same 2 people than are able to move another box that is also 600lbs but this box is 1'x5'.
Now is it true that they are able to move the 2nd box because the weight of 600lbs is distributed over a wider area?

If so is there a name for this theory, that i can look up?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A box has 3 dimensions. What are the 3 dimensions of the two different boxes? (use Length x Width x Height)

If they're the same weight, the only thing I can think of is that it is easier somehow for the two people to get hold of the box and lift with their legs better. Like, if the first box makes it awkward for them to get their heads over their hands.
 
1st box 3x3x3
2nd box 1x5x3
 
Beats me. Maybe there's more to the problem than you are stating. For example, you said "lift" for the 1st box, but "move" for the second one. Why the difference? And with the full dimensions you list, the densities of the boxes must be different if they weigh the same but have different volumes. Maybe the 2nd box is easier to tip over because it has a narrower base?
 
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...
Back
Top