Nash's Theorem proof in 2by2 games

Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2
According to Nash's Theorem, every game has at least one Nash Equilibrium, whether that be a pure strategy or a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium. However, I have not been able to find a proof for the theorem.

I am looking for a proof of the theorem in 2by2 games involving simultaneous strategies. Perhaps someone here knows good places where these proofs can be found? I googled but most seem to explain the theorem rather superficially without a rigorous mathematical approach.

Thanks!

BiP
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yep! The proofs that show up on google generalize it to 'n' players each having many strategies.

I was looking for a short proof on the simple case of 2by2 games with only 2 players. It should proof the existence of at least one Nash equilibrium.

BiP
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top