National Instruments MultiSim, or something else?

  • Thread starter Thread starter OJFord
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Instruments
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding suitable circuit simulation software, with a focus on NI MultiSim and DesignSpark. The user has tested MultiSim through an expired evaluation license and finds it promising, while also appreciating DesignSpark. There's a query about whether there is an industry standard software for circuit simulation, as variations among options are limited. Other users mention alternatives like MicroCAP and PSPICE, indicating a range of experiences with different tools. The conversation emphasizes the importance of reliability and sustainability in software choices for circuit design.
OJFord
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I've been long looking for some better software.

I haven't previously paid, but I'm prepared to pay a small amount for something worthwhile. (Student discount helps!)

I've been playing with a now expired evaluation license of NI MultiSim, which seems pretty good.

I also quite liked DesignSpark from RS, but MultiSim seems like a more sustainable/reliable idea.


Obviously there's only so much variation between them anyway - but is there an 'industry standard', or one that, in your experience, is pretty prominent throughout industry?


Thanks,

(Oh and yes, for the sake of being transparent I have posted this on a couple of other forums too - just because I want a range of responses.)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
OJFord said:
I've been long looking for some better software.

I haven't previously paid, but I'm prepared to pay a small amount for something worthwhile. (Student discount helps!)

I've been playing with a now expired evaluation license of NI MultiSim, which seems pretty good.

I also quite liked DesignSpark from RS, but MultiSim seems like a more sustainable/reliable idea.


Obviously there's only so much variation between them anyway - but is there an 'industry standard', or one that, in your experience, is pretty prominent throughout industry?


Thanks,

(Oh and yes, for the sake of being transparent I have posted this on a couple of other forums too - just because I want a range of responses.)

Here are a few threads from the EE forum where we discuss different SPICE programs:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=558549

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=224535

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=142800

I've not used MultiSim myself. I use MicroCAP, and have looked at PSPICE in the past.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
80
Views
67K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top