Natural Frequency in Finite Element Method

Click For Summary
A fixed-free bar has a single natural frequency, but when analyzed using the finite element method (FEM), it can yield multiple eigenvalues corresponding to natural frequencies. The true natural frequency may depend on the point of force application, and while a real bar has an infinite number of natural frequencies, the lowest frequencies from a FEM model should align with those of the actual bar. It's important to consider that the FEM may also identify axial, torsional, and bending modes, so reviewing mode shape plots is essential for accuracy. Common issues with incorrect frequency results often stem from inconsistent unit usage in material properties, particularly in FEM applications.
Hassan2
Messages
422
Reaction score
5
Hi all,

A fixed-free bar has a single natural frequency. When we discretize such a bar in the finite element method, then the natural frequencies are the eigenvalues and an nχn matrix where n is the number of the degree of freedom which is usually large. Thus we obtain up to n natural frequencies. I don't know which one of the frequencies is the (nearly) true one. Anyone has an Idea?

Your help would be appreciated.

Edit: I think I was wrong and the natural frequency of the bar depends of the point of force(s).
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hassan2 said:
A fixed-free bar has a single natural frequency.

No, a real bar also has an infinite number of natural frequencies. You probably have a formula that gives the lowest one. The three lowest bending frequencies of a cantilever are in the ratio 1.0 : 6.27 : 17.55.

The lowest frequencies from a finite element model should correspond to the lowest frequencies of the real bar. Remember the FE program may be also be finding axial and torsional modes, and bending modes in both planes of the beam. It's a good idea to look at plots of the mode shapes to check what they are.

If all the FE model frequencies look completely wrong, a common reason is using the wrong units for the material properties, especially if you are using US units where "pounds per square inch" for Youngs modulus and "pounds per cubic inch" for density are NOT consistent units (unless the FE program let's you input the conversion factor between mass and weight units as a separate input quantity).
 
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K