Natural Orbitals for Particles in a Box

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the applicability of sine waves as natural orbitals for particles in a box, particularly when considering electron-electron interactions. It is established that sine functions do not serve as the eigenstates of the interacting electron system. Instead, Slater determinants of sine wave solutions can be utilized as a basis for addressing the interacting electron problem. For optimal ground state solutions, employing a test wave-function with adjustable parameters and applying the variational principle is recommended.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically wavefunctions and eigenstates.
  • Familiarity with Slater determinants and their role in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of the variational principle in quantum mechanics.
  • Basic concepts of density matrices and their diagonalization.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the variational principle in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about Slater determinants and their significance in many-body quantum systems.
  • Research the construction and diagonalization of density matrices in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore perturbation theory and its implications for interacting electron systems.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers focusing on many-body quantum systems and electron interactions will benefit from this discussion.

Morberticus
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Natural Orbitals for "Particles in a Box"

Hi,

Are Sine waves the natural orbitals for particles in a box when electron-electron interactions are considered? Or is it only true for non-interacting electrons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I believe this is a rather complicated problem but I'm not sure if sine functions would be a good basis to use, the electrons would want to stay on opposite sides of the box but then you would have to also worry about their wavefunctions being antisymmetric. It's not a trivial problem.
 


If by "natural" you mean the *eigenstates* of the interacting electron system, then no. But you could take Slater determinants of the sine wave solutions as a useful *basis* to work in for the interacting electron problem. If you really want to find a good ground state though, probably the best approach would be to use a test wave-function with a few free parameters and apply the variational principle.
 


sam_bell said:
If by "natural" you mean the *eigenstates* of the interacting electron system, then no. But you could take Slater determinants of the sine wave solutions as a useful *basis* to work in for the interacting electron problem. If you really want to find a good ground state though, probably the best approach would be to use a test wave-function with a few free parameters and apply the variational principle.

Natural orbitals are defined technically as the orbitals which diagonalize the 1-density operator.
 


If you're looking for "natural orbitals" in the Frank Weinhold sense, then do what sam bell suggested to get the eigenstates in that particular basis and then construct the density matrix as DrDu suggested and diagonalize it to get the linear combination of those eigenstates that gives you the natural orbitals.
 


I suppose the answer is no. To prove this it would be sufficient to show that inclusion of interaction in lowest order of perturbation theory destroys diagonality of the density matrix. Given that the energy levels aren't degenerate, I suppose this reduces to showing that the Hartree Fock orbtials cannot be chosen as sine waves.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K