Natural Orbitals for Particles in a Box

Morberticus
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Natural Orbitals for "Particles in a Box"

Hi,

Are Sine waves the natural orbitals for particles in a box when electron-electron interactions are considered? Or is it only true for non-interacting electrons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I believe this is a rather complicated problem but I'm not sure if sine functions would be a good basis to use, the electrons would want to stay on opposite sides of the box but then you would have to also worry about their wavefunctions being antisymmetric. It's not a trivial problem.
 


If by "natural" you mean the *eigenstates* of the interacting electron system, then no. But you could take Slater determinants of the sine wave solutions as a useful *basis* to work in for the interacting electron problem. If you really want to find a good ground state though, probably the best approach would be to use a test wave-function with a few free parameters and apply the variational principle.
 


sam_bell said:
If by "natural" you mean the *eigenstates* of the interacting electron system, then no. But you could take Slater determinants of the sine wave solutions as a useful *basis* to work in for the interacting electron problem. If you really want to find a good ground state though, probably the best approach would be to use a test wave-function with a few free parameters and apply the variational principle.

Natural orbitals are defined technically as the orbitals which diagonalize the 1-density operator.
 


If you're looking for "natural orbitals" in the Frank Weinhold sense, then do what sam bell suggested to get the eigenstates in that particular basis and then construct the density matrix as DrDu suggested and diagonalize it to get the linear combination of those eigenstates that gives you the natural orbitals.
 


I suppose the answer is no. To prove this it would be sufficient to show that inclusion of interaction in lowest order of perturbation theory destroys diagonality of the density matrix. Given that the energy levels aren't degenerate, I suppose this reduces to showing that the Hartree Fock orbtials cannot be chosen as sine waves.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top