Natural Selection and David Lack's starling studies

AI Thread Summary
David Lack's experiments with Swiss starlings involved marking nestlings and later recapturing them to study survival rates. He found that starlings that laid more eggs experienced higher mortality rates among their young due to limited food resources. In contrast, starlings with smaller broods were able to provide sufficient food, leading to higher survival and reproductive success for their offspring. This demonstrates that natural selection favors traits that enhance the survival of young, particularly in resource-limited environments. Lack's findings highlight the importance of brood size in the context of natural selection.
Edin_Dzeko
Messages
204
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Describe Lack's experiments with Swiss starlings, and state what these experiments tell us about the effect of natural selection


Homework Equations


Lack's studies / experiment was that he marked the nestlings of the starlings and then he recaptured them months later when they had left their nests. He recorded that the starlings that laid more eggs, had a higher mortality than the ones that laid less eggs. There weren't enough food so the ones that laid more eggs couldn't give enough enough to all their young while the ones that laid a few eggs was able to provide adequate food for their young so the chances of the young in small broods surviving and reproducing are higher than those in the brood where more eggs are laid.


The Attempt at a Solution


Guys. Help. I'm really confused here
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you know, for natural selection, the key question is who has the most surviving offspring? Your description is a little too vague to answer that question. Sharpen it up, and I guess the rest of the answer will come easily.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top