MHB Natural Solutions for Positive Variables?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hatuk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Natural
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores whether a solution exists in natural numbers for a finite set of positive variables given a non-strict order on their expressions. It begins by analyzing equalities, noting that they define a subspace in real numbers with a basis of rational vectors. The thread emphasizes that rational points are dense in this subspace, allowing for approximations. It also highlights that strict inequalities and positivity conditions create an open subset containing a specific point. Ultimately, it concludes that by adjusting a rational point, an integer solution can be derived.
Hatuk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
Consider a finite set of positive variables $P = \{x_1,x_2,\ldots, x_n \}$, and a non-strict order on the expressions $\Sigma_{x_i \subseteq P}x_i$. For example:
$$P = \{x_1,x_2,x_3\}$$
$$x_1 + x_2 + x_3 > x_1 + x_2 > x_2 + x_3 > x_1 = x_2 > x_3$$
Can we claim that if there is a solution in which $\forall i,x_i \in \mathbb{R}^+$, there must be a solution in which $\forall i, x_i \in \mathbb{N}^+$?
Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You need to consider the equalities and the strict inequalities separately.

Start with the equalities. If there are $d$ of them, they will define an $(n-d)$-dimensional subspace $S$ of $\Bbb{R}^n$, which will have a basis $\{\mathbf{e}_1,\ldots,\mathbf{e}_{n-d}\}$ consisting of rational vectors (vectors with rational coordinates). [In your example, there is just one equality, $x_1 = x_2$. That defines a two-dimensional subspace of $\Bbb{R}^3$, with a basis $\{\mathbf{e}_1=(1,1,0),\mathbf{e}_2=(0,0,1)\}$.]

Every point in $S$ is of the form $\alpha_1\mathbf{e}_1 + \ldots + \alpha_{n-d}\mathbf{e}_{n-d}$, where $\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_{n-d}$ are real coefficients. By approximating these coefficients with rational numbers, you see that the rational points in $S$ are dense in $S$.

The strict inequalities in your set, together with the inequalities $x_i>0\ (1\leqslant i\leqslant n)$, define an open subset of $S$. You are told that this subset contains a point $\mathbf{x} = (x_1,\ldots,x_n)$. So by taking a rational point $\mathbf{r}$ in $S$ sufficiently close to $\mathbf{x}$, you can find a rational solution to the problem.

Finally, by multiplying $\mathbf{r}$ by the least common multiple of the denominators of all its coordinates, you get an integer solution to the problem.
 
Thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top