Natural vs Synthetic Compounds: Physical/Chemical Difference

  • Thread starter Thread starter coktail
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Natural
AI Thread Summary
There is no fundamental physical or chemical difference between synthetic and naturally-occurring compounds if they share the same chemical structure. Organic compounds, which contain carbon, can indeed be synthesized in laboratories, a process that has been successfully executed since the synthesis of urea in 1828. The distinction lies primarily in their origin rather than their chemical properties. Both synthetic and natural compounds can exhibit identical behaviors and characteristics. Overall, the ability to synthesize organic compounds is a well-established practice in chemistry.
coktail
Messages
118
Reaction score
1
Hi there,

First time posting in Chemistry, so go easy on me.

I'm wondering if there's any fundamental difference between synthetic and naturally-occurring compounds. By "fundamental" I mean some physical/chemical difference besides the process in which they came to be.

Related to this question: Can organic compounds (with carbon in them) be synthesized, or is that something only nature has figured out how to do?

Thanks very much.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
If they have the same chemical structure, there is no difference.
Can organic compounds (with carbon in them) be synthesized, or is that something only nature has figured out how to do?
They can, and this is done all the time in chemistry.
Urea was the first in 1828.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top