Need a little push in the right direction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dao Tuat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Push
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two chemistry problems involving calculations of enthalpy changes. The first problem involves mixing silver nitrate and strontium chloride solutions, where the user calculates the moles of reactants and determines the heat absorbed, ultimately arriving at a delta H of approximately 0.0539 kJ/mol for silver chloride formed. The second problem requires calculating the enthalpy change for a reaction involving calcium carbide and water, with participants discussing how to manipulate given equations and their associated delta H values to derive the desired reaction. The user seeks clarification on their approach and whether it is appropriate to assume constant pressure in their calculations. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of thermodynamic calculations and the need for clear understanding of stoichiometry and enthalpy.
Dao Tuat
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I have two questions.

First:

a coffe-cup clorimeter, 125 mL of a 2.75 M solution of silver nitrate at 25.00 degrees C is comined with 350 mL of a 4.00 M strontium chloride solution, aslo at 25.00 C. The temperature of the final solution is 32.15 degrees C. If the density of the final solution is 1.25 g/mL and the heat cpacity of the final solution is 4.33 J/C*g, calculate delta H in kJ/mol of silver chloride formed.

I'm not sure if I'm answering this correctly. Heres what I did:

I found that there is .34375 moles of AgNO3 and 1.4 moles of SrCl2

Using density = M/V, I found the mass to be 608g

I then calculated the heat absorbed to be 18.8 KJ

With this, I determined that the amount of moles burned = 349

I assumed a constant pressure, so that delta H = delta E = 18.8/349, thus ending up with .0539 kJ/mol

Does this seem right at all?



Second:

I have no idea how to do this problem, or even attempt to do it:

I'm asked to calculate the enthalpy change for CaC2 + 2 H2O = Ca(OH)2 + C2H2, given:
Ca + 2C = CaC2 delta H =-62.8 kJ
Ca+(1/2)O2 =CaO delta H =-635.5 kJ
CaO + H2) = Ca(OH)2 delta H =-653.1kJ
C2H2 + (5/2)O2 = 2 CO2 + H2O delta H = -1300kJ
C + O2 = CO2 delta H =-393.51kJ


Can anyone help me out here? I don't know anyone who has taken a chemistry class and my book isn't that good (I got the cheapest one I could find in english). An explination or any good websites discussing problems such as these would be highly appreciated.


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Code:
Okay, the idea here is manipulate the given equations
into the form you want, noting that you may
switch the direction of the equations provided you
change the sign on delta H, and you can adjust
the stochiotic (sp?) values provided you multiply
or divide delta H by that same amount. Here goes:

Want: CaC2 + 2 H2O = Ca(OH)2 + C2H2

Have:

(1) Ca + 2C = CaC2 delta H =-62.8 kJ
(2) Ca+(1/2)O2 =CaO delta H =-635.5 kJ
(3) CaO + H2O = Ca(OH)2 delta H =-653.1kJ (<-- CHANGED to H2O)
(4) C2H2 + (5/2)O2 = 2 CO2 + H2O delta H = -1300kJ
(5) C + O2 = CO2 delta H =-393.51kJ

CaC2 = Ca + 2C                 delta H = 62.8 kj (using (1))
CaO + H20 = Ca(OH)2            delta H = -653.1 kj (using (3))
2 CO2 + H20 = C2H2 + (5/2)O2   delta H = 1300 kj (using (4))

Lets add these together and see what we get and work from
there:

CaC2 + CaO + 2 H2O + 2 CO2 = Ca + 2C + Ca(OH)2 + C2H2 + (5/2)O2

                               delta H = 62.8 + -653.1 + 1300
                                       = 709.7 kj

so next you may want to get rid of CaO on the LHS, so you might
add

   Ca + (1/2) O2 = CaO         delta H = -635.5 kj

so we have:

CaC2 + CaO + 2 H2O + 2 CO2 + Ca + (1/2) O2 =

Ca + 2C + Ca(OH)2 + C2H2 + (5/2)O2    delta H = 709.7 - 635.5 kj
                                              = 74.2

But some of the elements cancel (Ca on the left and
Ca on the right, etc), so we have

CaC2 + CaO + 2 H2O + 2 CO2 = 2C + Ca(OH)2 + C2H2 + 2 O2

                                      delta H = 74.2

Note what happened to O2, we had (1/2) on the left and
(5/2) on the right, (5/2) - (1/2) = 2.

Anyway you sort of work it like that until you get
the right equation.
 
Okay, that makes sense. Thanks a lot!

How does the first answer look? I feel like I did it wrong. Is it safe to assume constant pressure, or should I be trying to solve this some other way?

Thanks again for your help.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top