Need advice - does this curriculum for Math & Science (at Toronto) look good?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a student preparing to transition into a physics and mathematics program at the University of Toronto after completing their first degree. The student expresses a long-standing interest in physics and a desire to integrate mathematics into their studies. They seek feedback on the curriculum, which includes foundational courses in analysis, algebra, and physics, progressing to advanced topics like quantum mechanics and general relativity. Concerns are raised about the adequacy of the mathematical foundation provided by the program, particularly regarding the transition from algebra to differential equations. The student also contemplates taking additional computer science courses and worries about their preparedness, given their previous educational background. They plan to apply to both the University of Toronto and Waterloo, aiming to maintain a manageable course load while reinforcing their mathematical skills over the summer. The discussion highlights the importance of a solid theoretical foundation in mathematics for success in physics and the potential for flexibility in course selection based on individual strengths and interests.
singleton
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
I'm about to begin the last semester for my first degree. Somewhere in the first couple of years (I spread it over 5 years as I took time off and worked in the middle) I decided that I would eventually get into the physics program at Toronto. My family did not approve and so I stuck it out with the program I was in at the time. I'm not really bothered by it--I've had a blast.

Getting back to the story--I always thought that physics was interesting and it would be the road I eventually went for. I was certain that I was going to apply to the physics program when the time came. Then I went back and forth with math. Finally I found a specialist program offered at the University of Toronto which seems to offer enough of both to satisfy me.

However, I would like feedback from those who have been through a math or science program and know what to look for (particular courses). I want a good coverage of undergrad topics.

http://www.artsandscience.utoronto.ca/ofr/calendar/prg_mat.htm

It is the program listed at the very bottom of the page, "Mathematics and Physics(Science program)". The curriculum is:

First year: Analysis I, Algebra I, Algebra II, Foundations of Physics

Second year: Analysis II, Advanced Ordinary Differential Equations I, Fundamental Physics Laboratory, Electricity and Magnetism, Thermal Physics, Oscillations and Waves, Introduction to Quantum Physics

Third year: Partial Differential Equations, Introduction to Topology, Complex Analysis I, Real Analysis I, Introduction to Differential Geometry, Classical Mechanics, Electromagnetic Theory, Quantum Mechanics I

Fourth year: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum, General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics II, and one of: Applied Nonlinear Equations OR Macroscopic Physics OR Nonlinear Physics

Additionally, I'm thinking of sneaking in a few computer science credits if they allow for it. I might (rather, should) be exempt from the elective humanities credits as I will already have enough from my first degree ;) I'm particularly interested in the logic, complexity theory and algorithms classes. (By the way, do you know if they would let me take such courses if I had my grades up in the major area of focus?--I go to a community college and we aren't allowed such things. In fact, I think it is mandatory to normally take some credits outside of your major to graduate from UofT with a bachelors! and not just the humanities).

thanks and happy new year!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am slightly confused why you are taking Algebra I and II your first year but then you transition into Differential Equations the following year. You are going to need some heavy Calculus before you are able to fully comprehend differential equations. Although, after reading the description of 'Algebra I' it seems to resemble a Linear Algebra course.

My mathematics course requirements for high energy physics, consists of three calculus sequences, differential equations/PDE's, Linear Algebra, Vector Calculus and then some upper division sequences (although I also plan to double major in mathematics as well so I will be required to take a lot more mathematics, than that).

I'll read more about your course and see if I can give you more advice, although I am sure others will provide more informative responses.
 
Thanks for the response, complexPHILOSOPHY

In addition to the Algebra I and II, there is an Analysis I course in the first year as I listed. It takes up both the fall and winter semesters (a full academic year course).

The Analysis I description:
A theoretical course in calculus; emphasizing proofs and techniques, as well as geometric and physical understanding. Trigonometric identities. Limits and continuity; least upper bounds, intermediate and extreme value theorems. Derivatives, mean value and inverse function theorems. Integrals; fundamental theorem; elementary transcendental functions. Taylor’s theorem; sequences and series; uniform convergence and power series.

They use the Michael Spivak Calculus text for the course.

This is the higher first-year calculus offering--there is a normal (not as comprehensive on the theory) calculus class for engineers and science students, and an even lesser one for art students. This is the most detailed calculus class that is offered for first-year students at Toronto.

Is that enough foundation to comprehend the differential equations?

Also, the Analysis II course will be done in parallel with the differential equations.

Analysis II description:
Topology of Rn; compactness, functions and continuity, extreme value theorem. Derivatives; inverse and implicit function theorems, maxima and minima, Lagrange multipliers. Integrals; Fubini’s theorem, partitions of unity, change of variables. Differential forms. Manifolds in Rn; integration on manifolds; Stokes’ theorem for differential forms and classical versions.

thanks and hope you have a great day
 
I have decided to go ahead and apply. It has been on my mind long enough that I might as well pay the application fee and give it a go. I'm also going to apply to Waterloo.

My only concern is that I may not be able to handle either of them :(

I'll be graduating from a college with [hopefully] a 4.0 as I have maintained it up until the final semester (the one which begins in a few days). I study software development. However, I never had a formal mathematical foundation. My curriculum was completely absent of the theoretical CS topics and the math parts (though we covered some algorithms). Additionally, my 4.0 is misleading--I would argue my school has a rather easy curriculum.

I managed to pull 97%, 86% and 60% in the grade 13 calculus, algebra & geometry, and finite math classes (Ontario, Canada). The calculus one was high, but I studied many many hours for that and did it through correspondence which may have been easier (60% of the grade came from coursework I worked on independently from home, 40% came from an in-person written exam).

I'm starting to question my real ability. If I am accepted, I will spend the coming summer months reviewing the material from grade 13, and starting some of the program texts on my own.

Lastly, I do not plan to have a full course load in the first year-- I only wish to take the 3 classes per semester. Perhaps I might add one CS class of my preference in the winter semester.

I hope that what I lack in talent, I can make up with my hard work (as demonstrated in the current degree program I am in).

We'll see how it goes ;)
 
The mathematics courses in that program are very in depth and theoretical: in fact, almost all of them are the same ones that people in the Mathematics Specialist program take (i.e. the future mathematicians). If you are more interested in physics and aren't the greatest at proofs, then the Physics Specialist program might be better. At least that will give you the room to take extra math courses if you want, like MAT301 (groups) or MAT327 (topology).
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top