Need help explaining two equations for similar events

  • Thread starter Thread starter phox2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Events
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two equations related to the force exerted by water on charged objects, highlighting a specific equation involving water's dipole moment and a more generic electric field equation. The first equation, F = q [(2kp)/m^3], incorporates water's dipole moment, while the second, E = k (q/r^2), is a standard electric field equation. Participants explore the differences in distance metrics—cubed versus squared—and the implications of the unit vector in the generic equation. Clarification suggests that both equations are fundamentally similar, with differences arising from the specific context of water's properties. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of understanding physical equations and the role of dipole moments in charge interactions.
phox2
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Ok, while rummaging through the internet, trying to find out the magnitude of water's pull on charged objects, I came across two different equations. One seemed more helpful, because it seems specific to water polarity, and the other seemed a bit generic.

Helpful one: F= q [(2kp)/m^3] A reply from yahoo answers
F is force in Newtons
q is the charge of affected ion
k is the coulomb force constant
p is water's dipole moment (C.m.)
m is the distance between the centers of the two objects

Generic one: E = k (q/r^2) (unit vector) Wikipedia: electric fields

When looking closer, it seems that the two are the same, but what is the deal with one's distance being cubed and the other squared? Then, only one with unit vector multiplied in, and other has water's dipole moment.

Are they the same? Is the unit vector water's dipole moment? Is the cubed distance an error, or a fundamental difference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

phox2 said:
When looking closer, it seems that the two are the same, but what is the deal with one's distance being cubed and the other squared? Then, only one with unit vector multiplied in, and other has water's dipole moment.

Are they the same? Is the unit vector water's dipole moment? Is the cubed distance an error, or a fundamental difference?

Hi phox2! Welcome to PF! :smile:

yahoo is using dipole moment, which is coulomb.metres, and dividing by metres^3;

wikipedia is using charge, which is coulombs, and dividing by metres^2 …

same thing! :wink:
 
Oh...wow...hehe. Thanks, I'm kind of new to this subject in physics, so it's kinda hard dealing with what a part if an equation does, along with figuring out which unit is what.

Wait, so based on that, then the charge of the (+) side of water, because the ion is chlorine, is the dipole moment. Does that mean that the dipole moment is the charge of both the (+) and (-) side of water, no matter which which is exerting force? Maybe the charge of the (+) side of the dipole is the dipole moment, and the (-) side is 1, because the dipole moment is the multiple of both charge strength?
 
Last edited:
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top