Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around identifying reputable schools for aerospace and astronautical engineering. Participants share their insights on various institutions and offer suggestions based on personal knowledge and rankings.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- One participant inquires about good schools for aerospace and astronautical engineering, mentioning Embry-Riddle as a possibility but expressing uncertainty.
- Another participant suggests that the original question is too vague and recommends providing more specific criteria for better responses. They list several schools including Cal Poly, UC Davis, UC Irvine, MIT, Princeton, Penn State, Stanford, US Air Force Academy, and University of Texas Austin.
- A participant acknowledges the suggestion and asks specifically about Embry-Riddle, noting conflicting rankings found online.
- One participant looks up Embry-Riddle and concludes that while it may not be the top-ranked school, it offers a solid education in aeronautical engineering.
- Another participant suggests considering schools based on the user's location, mentioning UT Austin and Texas A&M for Texas residents and UC schools for those in California.
- A participant from Kansas expresses willingness to relocate for a good education and mentions having read conflicting rankings about Embry-Riddle.
- Wichita State University is recommended for its good program and connections with local aerospace businesses.
- Georgia Institute of Technology is noted as being ranked number 2 for aerospace engineering, just below MIT, with a provided link to the rankings and acceptance rate.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the best schools, as opinions vary regarding rankings and the significance of different programs. Multiple competing views remain regarding the reputation of Embry-Riddle and other institutions.
Contextual Notes
Participants express uncertainty regarding the rankings of schools, and some responses depend on personal experiences and regional considerations. The discussion reflects a variety of perspectives on what constitutes a good aerospace engineering program.