Need help Finding binding energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the binding energy of lithium-7 (3Li^7) using its atomic mass. The initial calculation of the mass defect yields a value of 0.040485u, which is then converted to energy using E=mc^2. However, a participant points out that the conversion to MeV appears incorrect, suggesting the result should be closer to 1/25 of 931.5 MeV based on the mass defect. They advise rechecking the calculations, particularly ensuring the speed of light is squared in the energy equation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate unit conversions in nuclear physics calculations.
Couture
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I need help with this problem: Find Binding energy (in MEV) for lithium 3Li^7. (atomic mass =7.016003u).

3Li^7 (seven is the nucleon number and three is the atomic number= total number of neutons and protons)


This is my attempt:

3 protons ; (7-3)= 4 Neutrons

3(1.007276u) + 4(1.008665u)=7.056488

7.056488 -7.016003u= 0.040485

0.040485u (1.66053888e-27kg/u * (3.00e8)^2=2.0314e-20J
(using equation E= delta mc^2) E=mc^2

2.0314e-20J 1ev/1.6022e-19J = 0.126788 meV


I entered this answer into my online homework, but its says its wrong. And my teacher says for this problem you don't have to account for the electrons when solving for the mass defect (delta m).

Help asap would be greatly appreciated my online homework will be do soon.
thankyou
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Couture said:
7.056488 -7.016003u= 0.040485

Looks OK to here.

0.040485u (1.66053888e-27kg/u * (3.00e8)^2=2.0314e-20J
(using equation E= delta mc^2) E=mc^2

2.0314e-20J 1ev/1.6022e-19J = 0.126788 meV

There is plainly something wrong with this because 1 amu is equivalent to 931.5 MeV, so your result should be about 1/25 of that. Check your calculation here again:

0.040485u (1.66053888e-27kg/u * (3.00e8)^2=2.0314e-20J

You should be getting something on the order of 6 x 10^-12 J. (Did you remember to square the c ?)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top